Re: [j-nsp] eve-ng - lab environment

2018-07-16 Thread Vincent Clement
The new jcl (Juniper Cloud labs) looks like a lot to eve ng, hope to give it a look soon. Le lundi 16 juillet 2018, Christian Scholz a écrit : > Welcome to the world of EVE. > I prepped my JNCIE purely with EVE ;) > > > > > > Am 16.07.2018 um 14:16 schrieb Aaron Gould : > > > > Oh my gosh,

Re: [j-nsp] eve-ng - lab environment

2018-07-16 Thread Aaron Gould
Cool, yeah, my gosh I like eve more than lsys at this point -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] eve-ng - lab environment

2018-07-16 Thread Aaron Gould
Oh my gosh, Eve-ng is awesome! If you didn't know about it, you gotta try it. It's so cool in its ability to run vSRX and vMX so far in my testing. In only a short couple days I've been able to test the following. - mpls martini l2circuits using ldp - mpls vpls bgp ad/ldp sig (rfc4762) - mpls

Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing Real World Deployment (was: VPC mc-lag)

2018-07-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On 12/Jul/18 18:46, Phil Bedard wrote: > This is from an industry perspective and not specific to Juniper. BIER won't > really happen without hardware support which is coming but will not be > compatible with a lot of already deployed hardware. Yes, this is what I have found so far,

Re: [j-nsp] How to maintain scripts

2018-07-16 Thread Saku Ytti
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 16:32, Benny Lyne Amorsen wrote: > Ideally JunOS should offer another way of distinguishing between forward > traffic and locally-terminated/originated traffic in ACL's, without > having to rely on getting lists of IP addresses correct. The box knows > whether it is

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 and MX104

2018-07-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On 12/Jul/18 23:07, Pavel Lunin wrote: > That's normal. Government and financial sectors always use the most > outdated solutions because of bureaucracy, compliance, certifications and > all those WTF reasons :) Probably with a big fat vendor (or vendor-partner) 10-year management & support

Re: [j-nsp] How to maintain scripts

2018-07-16 Thread Benny Lyne Amorsen
Pavel Lunin writes: > It's not maintaining scripts which is a bit of pain. It's on-box automaton > which is hell a lot of pain and there is very little reason to use it > nowadays. At least at any larger scale than a SOHO gateway for ten users, > doing something useless. That is all the more

Re: [j-nsp] How to maintain scripts

2018-07-16 Thread Benny Lyne Amorsen
Saku Ytti writes: > Generally yes. But then there are some debatable things like IP > options and DHCP snooping. Which are transit, but subject to RE. So > should they be subject to LO0, or should you just police them in > forwarding-filters? I believe latter, Juniper seems to think former. I

Re: [j-nsp] eve-ng - lab environment

2018-07-16 Thread Christian Scholz
Welcome to the world of EVE. I prepped my JNCIE purely with EVE ;) > Am 16.07.2018 um 14:16 schrieb Aaron Gould : > > Oh my gosh, Eve-ng is awesome! If you didn't know about it, you gotta try > it. It's so cool in its ability to run vSRX and vMX so far in my testing. > In only a short