Re: [j-nsp] IRB and 9.2 @MX

On Tue, October 28, 2008 20:17, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:28:38AM +0100, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote: I'm currently running 9.2 and IRB interfaces on MX work fine for me. I have only unicast traffic. 9.2R2.15 have broken interface counters (CLI and SNMP) on input

[j-nsp] Metro Ethernet CPE

Guys...! We are looking for good range of CPE (routers) for Home users SMBs...and wish if following features are supported. - FastEthernet port for WAN LAN - 802.1Q Trunking support on both FEs - IPv4 support (IPv6 is optional) - PPPoE support on FastEthernet main/Sub-interface

Re: [j-nsp] Metro Ethernet CPE

J-Series can help you. J-2320, J2350, J4350, J-6350. The hole family can help you with all features (I need to check PPPoE support). The differences are related to traffic processing and capacity. Att, Guys...! We are looking for good range of CPE (routers) for Home users SMBs...and

Re: [j-nsp] Metro Ethernet CPE

The PPPoE interface to the access concentrator can be a Fast Ethernet interface on any Services Router, a Gigabit Ethernet interface on J4350 and J6350 Services Routers, an ATM-over-ADSL or ATM-over-SHDSL interface on all J-series Services Routers except the J2300, or an ATM-over-SHDSL interface

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper SA appliance - IPSec tunneling

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Ivan c [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Further to that query, can anyone suggest an appliance that fulfils both client-less SSL and IPSec VPN modes? Cisco ASA can do both. -Brandon ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

[j-nsp] Replicated BGP sessions flapping on backup RE with NSR

We recently upgraded to 9.2R2.15 on T640s, and apparently all BGP address families are supported for NSR now (inet, inet-vpn, and l2vpn). Sure enough, I see BGP sessions being established on the backup REs, and routes showing up in my routing tables on the backup REs, but the sessions flap

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper SA appliance - IPSec tunneling

anyone have any experience with the SSL and IPSec capabilities on the following: Check Point Connectra Fortinet thanks Ivan On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Brandon Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Ivan c [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Further to that query, can

[j-nsp] Meaning of except in firewall filters

Hi, I'm trying to restrict SSH access on some of my routers to allow connections from just a few known source networks (defined in a prefix list called ssh-allowed). I then came up with the following, and applied it as an input filter on lo0.0: [edit firewall filter lo0-input] term

[j-nsp] RE CPU on MX

Does anyone know what is the CPU type on MX Routing Engine?Thanks, Marlon ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] RE CPU on MX

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:36:04PM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Does anyone know what is the CPU type on MX Routing Engine?Thanks, Celeron 1.3GHz (RE-1300) or Pentium M 2.0GHz (RE-A-2000). Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz (1995.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6d8

Re: [j-nsp] Meaning of except in firewall filters

Try adding a prefix-list match to the restrict-ssh term which contains a 0/0 route. I don't think the except option is meant to be used in isolation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tore Anderson Sent: Wednesday, October

Re: [j-nsp] RE CPU on MX

Thanks. What about RE-S-2000 (S instead of A)Also what command did you run to show this info? Thanks On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:36:04PM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Does anyone know what is the CPU type on MX

Re: [j-nsp] RE CPU on MX

[EMAIL PROTECTED] show chassis hardware models | match Routing Routing Engine 0 REV 07 740-015113 1000741009RE- S-1300-2048-S Routing Engine 1 REV 07 740-015113 1000741008RE- S-1300-2048-S [EMAIL PROTECTED] show system boot-messages | find CPU CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R)