Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP EBGP Case Study...

Hoogen, Okay.. Earlier task required while accepting routes from peer to tag them with a community and prepend them with as number 65412 twice... I notice that when I deactivate that.. It works.. So obviously R3 is considering the routes received from R1 with prepend of 65412

[j-nsp] Restrictions in 802.3ad Links (Multicast)

Hello, can someone provide any information about restrictions (especially for multicast) on IEEE 802.3ad (Aggregated Ethernet) links in JunOS? We are currently using JunOS 8.5 in our lab-setup. - Can we use multicast on this AE links without any restrictions? - Is the

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP EBGP Case Study...

Hi Hoogen ! I see that there is a requirement as prepend them with as number 64512 twice not 65412 twice Because if prepend 65412 as we also have to enable as loop 3 From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

Re: [j-nsp] death by branding

-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Richard A Steenbergen Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:21 PM To: Doug McPherson Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] death by branding On Thu,

[j-nsp] L3VPN on J series enhance services

can L3VPN run on J series enhance services? I 've configured by follow below but never can reach by ping in routing instance l3vpn. I can't put the interface by member of vrf onto security zone trust interface . interfaces { ge-0/0/0 { vlan-tagging; unit 0 {

Re: [j-nsp] Generating events based on day of week

If you are interested in a supported approach then take a look at the day-event.slax event script that was just added to Junoscriptorium: http://junoscriptorium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/library/juniper/event/utility/day-event/day-event.xml It logs a syslog message every day in the format: Oct

[j-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

http://networkliberationmovement.net/ 15 hours some big announcement? Anyone know what this is? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

Looks like a poorly thought out advertising campaign to be honest. The important message will be buy our stuff if I had to guess. m On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Derick Winkworth wrote: http://networkliberationmovement.net/ 15 hours some big announcement? Anyone know what this is?

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp groups

Until now we've always used a seperate vrrp groupid for each vlan. But after reading this message I decided to give it a try, since I totally agree that it adds some complexity. If I understand the post correct something like this should work: n...@xx# show vlan-id 241; family inet {

Re: [j-nsp] death by branding

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:20:42 -0500 Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:15:23PM -0400, Doug McPherson wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote: http://www.e-gerbil.net/juniper_style_guide.pdf ? Possibe

Re: [j-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

Hi, Am 30.10.2009 15:22 Uhr schrieb Derick Winkworth: http://networkliberationmovement.net/ 15 hours some big announcement? Anyone know what this is? 15 days, most likely. Looks like a commercial. rgds, .m signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp groups

Just to verify, the /28 isn't a sub-set of the /27 is it? Junipers tend not to like setting up multiple netblocks(like a /28 that's inside a previously-configured /27) within the same interface, especially if you attempt to set them both using the same virtual-address. Network Engineer,

Re: [j-nsp] Generating events based on day of week

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:14:41AM -0700, Curtis Call wrote: BTW, if the need is to do stateless firewall filters that change based on the day of week then there is already a commit+event script in Junoscriptorium that do all the heavy lifting for you. With them loaded, all you need to do

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp groups

No, it is a different virtual address and also a completely different subnet! -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jonathan Brashear [mailto:jonathan.brash...@hq.speakeasy.net] Verzonden: vrijdag 30 oktober 2009 17:11 Aan: Niels Ardts; 'Terry Baranski'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Onderwerp:

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp groups

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:02AM, Niels Ardts wrote: However, an error is returned: edit interfaces ae1 unit 241 family inet address yy] 'vrrp-group 241' Duplicate interface: ae1 unit: 241 vrrp-group: 241 for address: and address: error: configuration check-out failed [edit

[j-nsp] Gersham A Johnson/US/DNY is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 10/30/2009 and will not return until 11/02/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. If you have an urgent network request,please call the RRD Helpdesk: 1-800-rrd-help ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP EBGP Case Study...

My Bad typo error... Thanks to all... On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Sean Clarke s...@clarke-3.demon.nlwrote: Yes that's a solution, or workaround - but why do you want to prepend to your internal peers ? Surely it only makes sense to prepend out of your network, and use local

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp groups

Ah, yes that makes sense! Thanks for your explanation. -Niels Op 30 okt 2009 om 17:44 heeft Terry Baranski tbaran...@mail.com het volgende geschreven:\ On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:02AM, Niels Ardts wrote: However, an error is returned: edit interfaces ae1 unit 241 family inet address

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

Only an idiot will make an important announcement on a Saturday. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matlock, Kenneth L Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:15 PM To: Drew Weaver; Derick Winkworth; Cisco NSP;

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

It's a marketing campaign. A so-called viral campaign (according to their blog -- http://opinion.rapp.com/). The IP is hosted by Rapp Collins Worldwide, who's a marketing firm. Don't know the actual client is. oo On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote: On

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

As long as they don't attempt to Liberate my Network =P Regards, - Chris. On 2009-10-30, at 12:19 PM, Lynch, Tomas wrote: Only an idiot will make an important announcement on a Saturday. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

looks as if its working based on the activity in this thread... ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN on J series enhance services

Samin-san Please configure the J-series like this, it should be help... PC-J4350-J2350--PC L3vpn works well when you disable the security feature in Junos Enhance Services ade root# show | no-more ## Last changed: 2009-10-31 09:05:56 UTC version 9.2R4.4; system {

Re: [j-nsp] juniper trinity

The datasheet for the new MX 3D line cards is a little strange. Assuming that a find-and-replace of KB to K will make it more coherent, this is an awesome amount of queues when comparing to competitors. However, the new FPC/PIC-like card strategy is in 30Gb/s and 60Gb/s flavors. Given that the

[j-nsp] Fw: L3VPN on J series enhance services

Samin-san Please configure the J-series like this, it should be help... PC-J4350-J2350--PC L3vpn works well when you disable the security feature in Junos Enhance Services ade root# show | no-more ## Last changed: 2009-10-31 09:05:56 UTC version 9.2R4.4; system {