Thanks, Peter, Jared, that's exactly what I needed to know. I have noticed
the oversubscribed 4:1 words in IQ2 description, but could not found
explicit statement of how much traffic can this PIC handle. Vendors do not
like to admit such drawbacks in their products :)
I don't necessarily
Is the MX 10 and the MX 80 within the same Chassis?
The MX10 and the MX80 are the same physical chassis. You can buy licenses
to upgrade from MX10 to MX80.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
disclaimer, I'm on the buying end not the selling end.
there's one license per RE, so two.
recall that you're in HA mode (probably) so the features will be enabled
on both RE at the same. That said I don't recall it failing when
unlicensed (not that I recommend running that way) and your milage
Recently, i had came cross a problem, the customer need me to configure
the QinQ in the MX960 products, i am wondering if there anyone had the
example of the QinQ configuration in the MX?
Do you mean QinQ (dual tagged) *termination*? Or something else? Here
is an example of a dual tagged
The 3.2 Gbps limitation depends on the CFEB you have.
The CFEB-E bumps this up to full line rate on all ports (4 Gbps per
FPC).
M7i 8.4Gbps half-duplex CFEB / 10Gbps half-duplex CFEB-E
(this is because of the integrated GE/2FE Ports)
M10i 12.8Gbps half-duplex legacy CFEB, 3.2Gbps per FPC
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 04:02:13 AM Zaid Hammoudi
wrote:
Keegan,
Look into add-path, something that is not supported in
JUNOS yet, but will be sometime this year.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-walton-bgp-add-paths-06
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Tuesd
On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:50:10 PM Pavel Lunin wrote:
I'd say you should buy DPCs only if you really need any
features, that MPC does not support (yet :). NG mVPN or
something like (be sure you really need it now).
NG-MVPN is supported on the MPC's. Granted, there are some
issues when
On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:23:14 AM Vladislav A. VASILEV
wrote:
I am in process of procuring new hardware and I've got a
question. If you were to go for MX480 would you order it
with MPCs or DPCs. Also if your network were to have
MX80s as well which are Trio based would that influence
Hello Mark,
What kind of MXs do you have this working on? MX80 or on some of the others
in the family?
I am asking because I was told P2MP LSPs were not supported on MX240/480/960
with MPCs.
Also when considering DPCs/MPCs there seems to be no support for IEEE
802.1ah-2008 on MPCs.
Vladislav
On Friday, August 26, 2011 11:38:25 PM Clarke Morledge
wrote:
I would love to be proven wrong on this, but I do not
think you can use family any filters on the lo0
interface.You can only use family inet filters,
and presumably you could use family inet6 (haven't
tested that).
'family
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 11:47:19 PM Vladislav A. VASILEV
wrote:
What kind of MXs do you have this working on? MX80 or on
some of the others in the family?
MX480.
I am asking because I was told P2MP LSPs were not
supported on MX240/480/960 with MPCs.
Contact your SE and account manager
Dear Juniper,
You guys broke your mime types again, at least for all the 10.4S6.6
service release URLs. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Hi all,
So, --sigh--, it looks like there are still severe bugs being
discovered in JUNOS 10.4:
http://www.juniper.net/alerts/viewalert.jsp?txtAlertNumber=PSN-2011-08-348actionBtn=Search
Does anyone know more about PR/676826 and what the various
conditions that trigger it might be? Anyone know
Has anyone tried third-party CWDM SFP+ 10gigE transceivers in MX Trio
or EX4500? A quick Google search turns up many vendors I haven't
heard of:
Optoway
Optospan
Prosfp
Fiberise
Eoptolink
Ftth-china
eNet Components
Transition Networks
and some I have:
MRV
Omnitron
With varied prices in the
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:42:21AM +1000, Dale Shaw wrote:
Hi all,
So, --sigh--, it looks like there are still severe bugs being
discovered in JUNOS 10.4:
http://www.juniper.net/alerts/viewalert.jsp?txtAlertNumber=PSN-2011-08-348actionBtn=Search
Does anyone know more about PR/676826 and
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:31:04PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Has anyone tried third-party CWDM SFP+ 10gigE transceivers in MX Trio
or EX4500? A quick Google search turns up many vendors I haven't
heard of:
We're running many of the 40km DWDM SFP+ in EX8200 quite successfully,
can't speak
Hello,
Are there any JunOS scripts that can we can use with MX Router to detect
DDos and then apply actions to those flows based on configuration? We
particularly interested in flows through the router and not flows to the RE
itself.
Thanks,
Ernest
So for example, if I have a meshed layer 2 network with switches and I would
like to be able to maintain device reachability using something like OSPF,
how would I go about doing this? Everything already had two connections to
its upstream etc, but they are in the form of trunks. Junos won't let
What platform is this? If its an MX, you can change the encapsulation of the
physical interface to flexible-ethernet-services and then you can add a unit
with family inet on it.
Derick Winkworth
CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721
http://blinking-network.blogspot.com
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
wrote:
We hit this bug on several MX devices running junos 64 at the 49 day
mark. 10.4R7 isn't due until October, so if you're running the new REs
you probably want to go with S6.6 for the fix.
Hmmm.. interesting.
I am curious about what version of junos people on the list run. If you're
sticking way behind, why?
j.j.j.
On Aug 30, 2011 8:24 PM, Dale Shaw dale.shaw+j-...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
wrote:
We hit this bug on several MX
Hi Morgan,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:
So for example, if I have a meshed layer 2 network with switches and I would
like to be able to maintain device reachability using something like OSPF,
how would I go about doing this? Everything already had two
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Jackson Jacobson
jackson.j.jacob...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious about what version of junos people on the list run. If you're
sticking way behind, why?
j.j.j.
Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks!
We run 10.0S1 on our EX-series boxes (apart from
So what kind of internal evaluation process do you guys (or gals) put new
versions of code through before production deployment? How do you simulate
the production traffic? Is your process pretty reliable?
Always curious,
j.j.j.
On Aug 30, 2011 8:34 PM, Dale Shaw dale.shaw+j-...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:28:31 AM Jackson Jacobson
wrote:
I am curious about what version of junos people on the
list run. If you're sticking way behind, why?
10.4R4.5 across the board here (10.4R6 on some MX's running
as BRAS's here).
We're not particularly pleased to see that even
MX'es - 10.4R5.5 - looking to move to 10.4R6 soon (and R7, and R8, etc...)
EX'es - 10.4R3.4 - looking to move to 10.4R6 soon
J's - 10.2R4.8 - end of the line due to 512M memory constraints
- Chris.
On 2011-08-31, at 1:28 PM, Jackson Jacobson wrote:
I am curious about what version of junos
I think that's precisely what he's trying to avoid. =)
What we did is to use RVIs (vlan.xxx), but had a series of VLANs (VLAN 2000,
2001, 2002, 2003 etc..) setup as point-to-point /30s between the EXes inside a
VLAN. Switch 1 to Switch 2 would be VLAN 2002. Switch 2 to Switch 3 would be
VLAN
27 matches
Mail list logo
