Re: [j-nsp] Junos 12.3 Release Date

2013-02-03 Thread Tore Anderson
* Paul Goyette 12.3 has now been released. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e146 http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e146 Comparing the above seems

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 12.3 Release Date

2013-02-03 Thread Craig Askings
Juniper now want you to buy a Advanced features licence to support Unicast reverse-path forwarding (RPF), this is getting absurd. On 3 February 2013 20:57, Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote: * Paul Goyette 12.3 has now been released.

[j-nsp] MPLS and QoS at penultimate hop ?

2013-02-03 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hi! Simple question I'm not able to find answer for: what is the order of label pop operation and BA classification on penultimate router ? I have a gut feeling that label is stripped first and then BA classification is done on a naked packet, f.e., ipprec-based in case of IP packet, without

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 12.3 Release Date

2013-02-03 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Craig Askings caski...@ionetworks.com.au wrote: Juniper now want you to buy a Advanced features licence to support Unicast reverse-path forwarding (RPF), this is getting absurd. I might think it less absurd if uRPF was more useful on EX3200 and friends. Is the

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 12.3 Release Date

2013-02-03 Thread William McLendon
I can only hope this is all some sort of terrible documentation error. That list of features requiring an AFL (at least for the EX32/42/45/8200/xre) is counter to how we have been selling and implementing this kit for years. And our Juniper SE informed us a while back that 12.3 would no

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 12.3 Release Date

2013-02-03 Thread Luca Salvatore
Wow that is interesting. I'm about to spend around $25k on licences for me EX range so I can run OSPFv3 without the stupid warnings clogging up my logs. But with the price of the AFL more expensive that the hardware it is a tough call getting it approved. If 12.3 doesn't need the AFL it may be

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS and QoS at penultimate hop ?

2013-02-03 Thread Chris Kawchuk
It was my understanding that the label was logically popped on Egress (in terms of how one would envision the packet flow); hence the outer label EXP bits were evaluated by the BA classifier on ingress properly. (Whether it's popped on ingress, yet evaluated prior-to-pop is a mechanics thing..)