* Paul Goyette
12.3 has now been released.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e146
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e146
Comparing the above seems
Juniper now want you to buy a Advanced features licence to support Unicast
reverse-path forwarding (RPF), this is getting absurd.
On 3 February 2013 20:57, Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote:
* Paul Goyette
12.3 has now been released.
Hi!
Simple question I'm not able to find answer for: what is the order
of label pop operation and BA classification on penultimate router ?
I have a gut feeling that label is stripped first and then BA
classification is done on a naked packet, f.e., ipprec-based
in case of IP packet, without
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Craig Askings
caski...@ionetworks.com.au wrote:
Juniper now want you to buy a Advanced features licence to support Unicast
reverse-path forwarding (RPF), this is getting absurd.
I might think it less absurd if uRPF was more useful on EX3200 and friends.
Is the
I can only hope this is all some sort of terrible documentation error.
That list of features requiring an AFL (at least for the EX32/42/45/8200/xre)
is counter to how we have been selling and implementing this kit for years.
And our Juniper SE informed us a while back that 12.3 would no
Wow that is interesting.
I'm about to spend around $25k on licences for me EX range so I can run OSPFv3
without the stupid warnings clogging up my logs.
But with the price of the AFL more expensive that the hardware it is a tough
call getting it approved.
If 12.3 doesn't need the AFL it may be
It was my understanding that the label was logically popped on Egress (in
terms of how one would envision the packet flow); hence the outer label EXP
bits were evaluated by the BA classifier on ingress properly. (Whether it's
popped on ingress, yet evaluated prior-to-pop is a mechanics thing..)
7 matches
Mail list logo