Re: [j-nsp] Bizaare bug of the year award

2008-09-26 Thread Richard Halfpenny
Dave Diller wrote: 6 Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-42.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.234) 13.428 ms Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-46.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.238) 15.618 ms Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-42.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.234) 15.574 ms Only thing in common here is the 62 first octet, though you can now see

Re: [j-nsp] Bizaare bug of the year award

2008-09-26 Thread Stacy W. Smith
Richard, I've filed PR 389794 to track this issue. --Stacy aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sep 25, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Ok, I just found a Juniper bug that is so strange I can't even bring myself to open a case for it. Not only because I can just imagine trying to

[j-nsp] Bizaare bug of the year award

2008-09-25 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
Ok, I just found a Juniper bug that is so strange I can't even bring myself to open a case for it. Not only because I can just imagine trying to explain it to JTAC, but because it is so freaking bizaare and funny that I just have to share it with others. :) It seems that in 9.1+ code there is

Re: [j-nsp] Bizaare bug of the year award

2008-09-25 Thread Stefan Fouant
Yep that one pretty much takes the cake! On 9/25/08, Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I just found a Juniper bug that is so strange I can't even bring myself to open a case for it. Not only because I can just imagine trying to explain it to JTAC, but because it is so

Re: [j-nsp] Bizaare bug of the year award

2008-09-25 Thread Wayne E. Bouchard
Thats a weird one alright. Only one way to really figure out what happened. Let there be diff... :-) On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 07:09:08PM -0400, Stefan Fouant wrote: Yep that one pretty much takes the cake! On 9/25/08, Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I just found a