Once upon a time, Juniper did a sensible thing and didn't let you
configure the same IP address on two different interfaces on the same
router. Then at some point in the past (the earliest I've noticed it was
8.2, but it could have been earlier), somehow the error check for this
condition got
On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I can't find a single legitimate reason for this behavior to exist. It
doesn't let you use both interfaces simultaniously, it doesn't let you
pre-stage a circuit move so you can move the link from one port to
another, and as best as I
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard A
Steenbergen
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:58 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Duplicate IP addresses on interfaces
Once upon a time, Juniper did a sensible thing and didn't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:18 PM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Duplicate IP addresses on interfaces
...
If one
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 01:29:51PM -0400, Tony Stout wrote:
Could this be useful in a situation where you have two links connected to
the same downstream device with Spanning Tree running to handle link failure
(active/passive). That way, if the primary link fails, the standby link
will be
inet 200.0.0.1/24
so-6/1/2upup
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard A
Steenbergen
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:39 AM
To: Jared Mauch
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Duplicate IP
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
It does for circuits that have valid link-state (i.e. not ethernet).
For example, we've had a T1 customer move to a new location, which
requires ordering a new local loop. We copy the provisioning from the
old loop to the new loop,
Well, I cannot comment farther on the merits. Proves you cannot please
all, all the time. I know folks get really mad when we break a
previously working config, which is why we (had) to allow on a ptp.
That said, I could not find any clear documentation as to how we handle
this, and was a bit
8 matches
Mail list logo
