Re: [j-nsp] experiences with MX ipfix active and inactive flow timeouts at 15s or lower?

Hi, - On 28 Oct, 2022, at 18:14, Michael Hare via juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net wrote: > Anyone running with less than 30s ipfix active and inactive flow timeouts > willing to share positive or negative experiences? Our target platform is > mx10003. > > We've been running active

[j-nsp] experiences with MX ipfix active and inactive flow timeouts at 15s or lower?

Anyone running with less than 30s ipfix active and inactive flow timeouts willing to share positive or negative experiences? Our target platform is mx10003. We've been running active 60 inactive 30 for quite some time and are looking to move closer to the known configuration floor of 10 for