Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
I wish there was a more elegant way, but when we approached JTAC and our Juniper SE about it. They confirmed it was the only method, which meant we were burning twice as many security zones per client L3VPN -> IPSEC tunnel service. My email search fu is failing in finding the kb article on it. On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 23:20, Aaron Gould wrote: > Craig, how did you do the LT config to "cycle" traffic back through ? you > have a link/kb on how-to ? Actually I'm wondering if there's a more > elegant > way then LT's (no offense since we all love accomplishing things and making > stuff work, but it seems that LT's and furthermore, physical cables lopped > from port to port on the front of the device, are usually ways to do things > that we can't figure out in software) :| > > Hugo, The other end is an MX104 with services card for ipsec capability > (MS-MIC-16G) > > I haven't yet put any customer edge interfaces behind the SRX or MX, but I > will do that this morning I simply wanted to put a subnet on the secure > tunnel interfaces and ping from st0.0 to ms-0/0/0.1 first, but I can do the > further edge config also. > > -Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: Hugo Slabbert [mailto:h...@slabnet.com] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:26 AM > To: Aaron Gould > Cc: 'Emille Blanc'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn > > Is the other end of this also an SRX configured in a similar way, or > something else? This seems to contradict basically any Juniper docs on SRX > around MPLS traffic re: flow/packet mode. Specifically given that it's > showing "drop" for MPLS traffic, I would be confused about how it's passing > MPLS-encap'd traffic. > > Can you pass other non-IPSEC IPv4 traffic from the SRX (or behind it) > across > the l3vpn to validate bidirectional traffic passing? > > -- > Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com > pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal > > On Thu 2019-Jul-11 15:34:26 -0500, Aaron Gould wrote: > > > > >Thanks Emille, Ummm, I may be misunderstanding you , but I don't think > >I have change from SRX flow-mode default. But I do have ldp neighbor > >up and mpls forwarding is occurring via mpls l3vpn vrf . and I do > >believe the ike phase 1 and phase 2 is working over this mpls l3vpn within > the srx > >but I just don't seem to be able to ping from one side of the st0 > >tunnel interface to the other. > > > >See... > > > >root@demo-srx300> show security flow status > > Flow forwarding mode: > >Inet forwarding mode: flow based > >Inet6 forwarding mode: drop > >MPLS forwarding mode: drop > >ISO forwarding mode: drop > >Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled > > Flow trace status > >Flow tracing status: off > > Flow session distribution > >Distribution mode: RR-based > >GTP-U distribution: Disabled > > Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off > > Flow packet ordering > >Ordering mode: Hardware > > > > > >root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 > > > >mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > >+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > > >0 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > > Receive > >1 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > > Receive > >2 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > > Receive > >13 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > > Receive > >16 *[VPN/0] 04:51:07 > > to table one.inet.0, Pop > >345552 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16507 > >345568 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16508 > >345584 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 2, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16512 > >345600 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16513 > >345616 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16516 > >345632 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16517 > >345648 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16518 > > >
Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
Yes Hugo, I can pass non-ipsec encrypted traffic via the MPLS L3VPN inside the SRX... isn't that what the IKE Phase 1 and IKE Phase 2 success is proving ? -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
Craig, how did you do the LT config to "cycle" traffic back through ? you have a link/kb on how-to ? Actually I'm wondering if there's a more elegant way then LT's (no offense since we all love accomplishing things and making stuff work, but it seems that LT's and furthermore, physical cables lopped from port to port on the front of the device, are usually ways to do things that we can't figure out in software) :| Hugo, The other end is an MX104 with services card for ipsec capability (MS-MIC-16G) I haven't yet put any customer edge interfaces behind the SRX or MX, but I will do that this morning I simply wanted to put a subnet on the secure tunnel interfaces and ping from st0.0 to ms-0/0/0.1 first, but I can do the further edge config also. -Aaron -Original Message- From: Hugo Slabbert [mailto:h...@slabnet.com] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:26 AM To: Aaron Gould Cc: 'Emille Blanc'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn Is the other end of this also an SRX configured in a similar way, or something else? This seems to contradict basically any Juniper docs on SRX around MPLS traffic re: flow/packet mode. Specifically given that it's showing "drop" for MPLS traffic, I would be confused about how it's passing MPLS-encap'd traffic. Can you pass other non-IPSEC IPv4 traffic from the SRX (or behind it) across the l3vpn to validate bidirectional traffic passing? -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal On Thu 2019-Jul-11 15:34:26 -0500, Aaron Gould wrote: > >Thanks Emille, Ummm, I may be misunderstanding you , but I don't think >I have change from SRX flow-mode default. But I do have ldp neighbor >up and mpls forwarding is occurring via mpls l3vpn vrf . and I do >believe the ike phase 1 and phase 2 is working over this mpls l3vpn within the srx >but I just don't seem to be able to ping from one side of the st0 >tunnel interface to the other. > >See... > >root@demo-srx300> show security flow status > Flow forwarding mode: >Inet forwarding mode: flow based >Inet6 forwarding mode: drop >MPLS forwarding mode: drop >ISO forwarding mode: drop >Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled > Flow trace status >Flow tracing status: off > Flow session distribution >Distribution mode: RR-based >GTP-U distribution: Disabled > Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off > Flow packet ordering >Ordering mode: Hardware > > >root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 > >mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) >+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > >0 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > Receive >1 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > Receive >2 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > Receive >13 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 > Receive >16 *[VPN/0] 04:51:07 > to table one.inet.0, Pop >345552 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16507 >345568 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16508 >345584 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 2, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16512 >345600 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16513 >345616 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16516 >345632 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16517 >345648 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 >> to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16518 > >root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 terse > >mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) >+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > >A V DestinationP Prf Metric 1 Metric 2 Next hopAS path >* ? 0 M 0 1 Receive >* ? 1 M 0 1 Receive >* ? 2 M 0 1 Receive >* ? 13 M 0 1 Receive >* ? 16 V 0Table >* ? 345552 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 >* ? 345568 L 9 4>10.101.14.197 >* ? 345584 L 9 2>10.101.14.197 >* ? 345600
Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
t;10.101.14.197 > >* ? 345680 L 9 6>10.101.14.197 > >* ? 345696 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 > >* ? 345712 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 > >* ? 345728 L 9 6 >10.101.14.197 > >* ? 345744 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 > > > >root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 terse | count > >Count: 528 lines > > > >root@demo-srx300> show ldp neighbor > >AddressInterface Label space ID Hold time > >10.101.14.197 ge-0/0/0.0 10.101.0.254:0 10 > > > >root@demo-srx300> > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Emille Blanc [mailto:emi...@abccommunications.com] > >Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:04 PM > >To: Aaron Gould; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >Subject: RE: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn > > > >Based on what you described, it sounds like you already got your MPLS/LDP > >running in a packet-mode routing-instance, as otherwise MPLS is dropped on > >an SRX in flow mode. > > > >No obvious ideas with the output provided otherwise. > >Do the flows in your IPSEC instance get created? > > > >-Original Message- > >From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of > >Aaron Gould > >Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:27 PM > >To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >Subject: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn > > > >Anyone ever done it ? To be clear, I have mpls/ldp/ospf/bgp enabled the > SRX > >such that I have an l3vpn functional into the SRX. > > > > > > > >I have a lo0.99 interface as the external interface used for ike/ipsec. > >Seems that I'm pretty close to getting this done, as i have ike phase 1 up > >and ike phase 2 up, but only seeing encrypted packets as I try to ping > >between the st0.0 interface and the ms-0/0/0.1 inside interface on the > other > >side (mx104 with ms-mic-16g) > > > > > > > >Let me know what I'm missing. > > > > > > > >I'm seeing drops in these to show outputs. which seems to coincide with a > >100-packet ping test... > > > > > > > > > > > >root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics > > > >Current sessions: 9 > > > >Packets forwarded: 417926 > > > >Packets dropped: 15604 > > > >Fragment packets: 0 > > > >Pre fragments generated: 0 > > > >Post fragments generated: 0 > > > > > > > >root@demo-srx300> show security flow status > > > > Flow forwarding mode: > > > >Inet forwarding mode: flow based > > > >Inet6 forwarding mode: drop > > > >MPLS forwarding mode: drop > > > >ISO forwarding mode: drop > > > >Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled > > > > Flow trace status > > > >Flow tracing status: off > > > > Flow session distribution > > > >Distribution mode: RR-based > > > >GTP-U distribution: Disabled > > > > Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off > > > > Flow packet ordering > > > >Ordering mode: Hardware > > > > > > > >root@demo-srx300> show security ipsec statistics > > > >ESP Statistics: > > > > Encrypted bytes: 252264 > > > > Decrypted bytes:0 > > > > Encrypted packets: 1618 > > > > Decrypted packets: 0 > > > >AH Statistics: > > > > Input bytes:0 > > > > Output bytes: 0 > > > > Input packets: 0 > > > > Output packets: 0 > > > >Errors: > > > > AH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0 > > > > ESP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 > > > > Bad headers: 0, Bad trailers: 0 > > > > > > > >root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics | grep rop > > > >Packets dropped: 15650 > > > > > > > >root@demo-srx300> ping 10.102.199.66 routing-instance one rapid interval > .1 > >count 100 > > > >PING 10.102.199.66 (10.102.199.66): 56 data bytes > > > > > >
Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
Is the other end of this also an SRX configured in a similar way, or something else? This seems to contradict basically any Juniper docs on SRX around MPLS traffic re: flow/packet mode. Specifically given that it's showing "drop" for MPLS traffic, I would be confused about how it's passing MPLS-encap'd traffic. Can you pass other non-IPSEC IPv4 traffic from the SRX (or behind it) across the l3vpn to validate bidirectional traffic passing? -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal On Thu 2019-Jul-11 15:34:26 -0500, Aaron Gould wrote: Thanks Emille, Ummm, I may be misunderstanding you , but I don't think I have change from SRX flow-mode default. But I do have ldp neighbor up and mpls forwarding is occurring via mpls l3vpn vrf . and I do believe the ike phase 1 and phase 2 is working over this mpls l3vpn within the srx but I just don't seem to be able to ping from one side of the st0 tunnel interface to the other. See... root@demo-srx300> show security flow status Flow forwarding mode: Inet forwarding mode: flow based Inet6 forwarding mode: drop MPLS forwarding mode: drop ISO forwarding mode: drop Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled Flow trace status Flow tracing status: off Flow session distribution Distribution mode: RR-based GTP-U distribution: Disabled Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off Flow packet ordering Ordering mode: Hardware root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 0 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 1 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 2 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 13 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 16 *[VPN/0] 04:51:07 to table one.inet.0, Pop 345552 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16507 345568 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16508 345584 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 2, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16512 345600 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16513 345616 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16516 345632 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16517 345648 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16518 root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 terse mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both A V DestinationP Prf Metric 1 Metric 2 Next hopAS path * ? 0 M 0 1 Receive * ? 1 M 0 1 Receive * ? 2 M 0 1 Receive * ? 13 M 0 1 Receive * ? 16 V 0Table * ? 345552 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345568 L 9 4>10.101.14.197 * ? 345584 L 9 2>10.101.14.197 * ? 345600 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345616 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345632 L 9 4>10.101.14.197 * ? 345648 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345664 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 * ? 345680 L 9 6>10.101.14.197 * ? 345696 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 * ? 345712 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 * ? 345728 L 9 6>10.101.14.197 * ? 345744 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 terse | count Count: 528 lines root@demo-srx300> show ldp neighbor AddressInterface Label space ID Hold time 10.101.14.197 ge-0/0/0.0 10.101.0.254:0 10 root@demo-srx300> -Original Message- From: Emille Blanc [mailto:emi...@abccommunications.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:04 PM To: Aaron Gould; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn Based on what you described, it sounds like you already got your MPLS/LDP running in a packet-mode routing-instance, as otherwise MPLS is dropped on
Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
Thanks Emille, Ummm, I may be misunderstanding you , but I don't think I have change from SRX flow-mode default. But I do have ldp neighbor up and mpls forwarding is occurring via mpls l3vpn vrf . and I do believe the ike phase 1 and phase 2 is working over this mpls l3vpn within the srx but I just don't seem to be able to ping from one side of the st0 tunnel interface to the other. See... root@demo-srx300> show security flow status Flow forwarding mode: Inet forwarding mode: flow based Inet6 forwarding mode: drop MPLS forwarding mode: drop ISO forwarding mode: drop Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled Flow trace status Flow tracing status: off Flow session distribution Distribution mode: RR-based GTP-U distribution: Disabled Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off Flow packet ordering Ordering mode: Hardware root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 0 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 1 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 2 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 13 *[MPLS/0] 04:51:07, metric 1 Receive 16 *[VPN/0] 04:51:07 to table one.inet.0, Pop 345552 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16507 345568 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16508 345584 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 2, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16512 345600 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16513 345616 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16516 345632 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 4, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16517 345648 *[LDP/9] 04:43:04, metric 3, tag 0 > to 10.101.14.197 via ge-0/0/0.0, Swap 16518 root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 terse mpls.0: 524 destinations, 524 routes (524 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both A V DestinationP Prf Metric 1 Metric 2 Next hopAS path * ? 0 M 0 1 Receive * ? 1 M 0 1 Receive * ? 2 M 0 1 Receive * ? 13 M 0 1 Receive * ? 16 V 0Table * ? 345552 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345568 L 9 4>10.101.14.197 * ? 345584 L 9 2>10.101.14.197 * ? 345600 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345616 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345632 L 9 4>10.101.14.197 * ? 345648 L 9 3>10.101.14.197 * ? 345664 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 * ? 345680 L 9 6>10.101.14.197 * ? 345696 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 * ? 345712 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 * ? 345728 L 9 6>10.101.14.197 * ? 345744 L 9 7>10.101.14.197 root@demo-srx300> show route table mpls.0 terse | count Count: 528 lines root@demo-srx300> show ldp neighbor AddressInterface Label space ID Hold time 10.101.14.197 ge-0/0/0.0 10.101.0.254:0 10 root@demo-srx300> -Original Message- From: Emille Blanc [mailto:emi...@abccommunications.com] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:04 PM To: Aaron Gould; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn Based on what you described, it sounds like you already got your MPLS/LDP running in a packet-mode routing-instance, as otherwise MPLS is dropped on an SRX in flow mode. No obvious ideas with the output provided otherwise. Do the flows in your IPSEC instance get created? -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:27 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn Anyone ever done it ? To be clear, I have mpls/ldp/ospf/bgp enabled the SRX such that I have an l3vpn functional into the SRX. I have a lo0.99 interface as the external interface used for ike/ipsec. Seems that I'm pretty close to g
Re: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
Based on what you described, it sounds like you already got your MPLS/LDP running in a packet-mode routing-instance, as otherwise MPLS is dropped on an SRX in flow mode. No obvious ideas with the output provided otherwise. Do the flows in your IPSEC instance get created? -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:27 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn Anyone ever done it ? To be clear, I have mpls/ldp/ospf/bgp enabled the SRX such that I have an l3vpn functional into the SRX. I have a lo0.99 interface as the external interface used for ike/ipsec. Seems that I'm pretty close to getting this done, as i have ike phase 1 up and ike phase 2 up, but only seeing encrypted packets as I try to ping between the st0.0 interface and the ms-0/0/0.1 inside interface on the other side (mx104 with ms-mic-16g) Let me know what I'm missing. I'm seeing drops in these to show outputs. which seems to coincide with a 100-packet ping test... root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics Current sessions: 9 Packets forwarded: 417926 Packets dropped: 15604 Fragment packets: 0 Pre fragments generated: 0 Post fragments generated: 0 root@demo-srx300> show security flow status Flow forwarding mode: Inet forwarding mode: flow based Inet6 forwarding mode: drop MPLS forwarding mode: drop ISO forwarding mode: drop Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled Flow trace status Flow tracing status: off Flow session distribution Distribution mode: RR-based GTP-U distribution: Disabled Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off Flow packet ordering Ordering mode: Hardware root@demo-srx300> show security ipsec statistics ESP Statistics: Encrypted bytes: 252264 Decrypted bytes:0 Encrypted packets: 1618 Decrypted packets: 0 AH Statistics: Input bytes:0 Output bytes: 0 Input packets: 0 Output packets: 0 Errors: AH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0 ESP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 Bad headers: 0, Bad trailers: 0 root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics | grep rop Packets dropped: 15650 root@demo-srx300> ping 10.102.199.66 routing-instance one rapid interval .1 count 100 PING 10.102.199.66 (10.102.199.66): 56 data bytes --- 10.102.199.66 ping statistics --- 100 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss root@demo-srx300> show security ipsec statistics ESP Statistics: Encrypted bytes: 267864 Decrypted bytes:0 Encrypted packets: 1718 Decrypted packets: 0 AH Statistics: Input bytes:0 Output bytes: 0 Input packets: 0 Output packets: 0 Errors: AH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0 ESP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 Bad headers: 0, Bad trailers: 0 root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics | grep rop Packets dropped: 15755 -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] srx ipsec tunnel over mpls l3vpn
Anyone ever done it ? To be clear, I have mpls/ldp/ospf/bgp enabled the SRX such that I have an l3vpn functional into the SRX. I have a lo0.99 interface as the external interface used for ike/ipsec. Seems that I'm pretty close to getting this done, as i have ike phase 1 up and ike phase 2 up, but only seeing encrypted packets as I try to ping between the st0.0 interface and the ms-0/0/0.1 inside interface on the other side (mx104 with ms-mic-16g) Let me know what I'm missing. I'm seeing drops in these to show outputs. which seems to coincide with a 100-packet ping test... root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics Current sessions: 9 Packets forwarded: 417926 Packets dropped: 15604 Fragment packets: 0 Pre fragments generated: 0 Post fragments generated: 0 root@demo-srx300> show security flow status Flow forwarding mode: Inet forwarding mode: flow based Inet6 forwarding mode: drop MPLS forwarding mode: drop ISO forwarding mode: drop Enhanced route scaling mode: Disabled Flow trace status Flow tracing status: off Flow session distribution Distribution mode: RR-based GTP-U distribution: Disabled Flow ipsec performance acceleration: off Flow packet ordering Ordering mode: Hardware root@demo-srx300> show security ipsec statistics ESP Statistics: Encrypted bytes: 252264 Decrypted bytes:0 Encrypted packets: 1618 Decrypted packets: 0 AH Statistics: Input bytes:0 Output bytes: 0 Input packets: 0 Output packets: 0 Errors: AH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0 ESP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 Bad headers: 0, Bad trailers: 0 root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics | grep rop Packets dropped: 15650 root@demo-srx300> ping 10.102.199.66 routing-instance one rapid interval .1 count 100 PING 10.102.199.66 (10.102.199.66): 56 data bytes --- 10.102.199.66 ping statistics --- 100 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss root@demo-srx300> show security ipsec statistics ESP Statistics: Encrypted bytes: 267864 Decrypted bytes:0 Encrypted packets: 1718 Decrypted packets: 0 AH Statistics: Input bytes:0 Output bytes: 0 Input packets: 0 Output packets: 0 Errors: AH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0 ESP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 Bad headers: 0, Bad trailers: 0 root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics | grep rop Packets dropped: 15755 -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
