There's plenty of good recourses to aid your studies. JNCIA-M is fairly easy
to pass while as JNCIS-M is much harder and you need to study well the
related materials (CJNR AJNR).
At juniper.net there's lots of material you can use (e-learning, pdf's,
webinars etc. free of charge). I'll post
Hi Marcin,
we have the same problems with M7Is in the may:
*M7i panic: ad_ioctl:1275539168: ad1: Standby not armed but state is in
valid: state=ARMED*
And all of this problems come after installing (we never did not use
internal CF in its before) Compact Flash 1GB (not from official Juniper
Hi guys,
we have the same problems with M7Is in the may:
*M7i panic: ad_ioctl:1275539168: ad1: Standby not armed but state is in
valid: state=ARMED*
And all of this problems come after installing (we never did not use
internal CF in its before) Compact Flash 1GB (not from official Juniper
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
So basically, this stalled route issue has been going on for so long,
that its truthful to say that Juniper probably doesn't think its
important to fix? or they don't care?
6 years by my count. The weird thing is I'm
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 03:18:34 am David water wrote:
Using those route types we can communicate about the
source and destinations in MVPN.
Source information is learned by the Sender PE router. This
can either be through the VPN C-RP infrastructure or MSDP.
Receiver PE routers would
On Wednesday 30 of June 2010 10:10:24 Akhmedd Aly wrote:
Hi Marcin,
we have the same problems with M7Is in the may:
*M7i panic: ad_ioctl:1275539168: ad1: Standby not armed but state is in
valid: state=ARMED*
And all of this problems come after installing (we never did not use
internal
On Wednesday 30 of June 2010 03:50:49 Derick Winkworth wrote:
I wonder what their official line is. Might be similar to their official
line with respect to the manufacturing issue with the EX series, where so
many ASICs are just bad... I think they have some code in JUNOS now that
detects the
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
[dd]
How unfortunate. I wonder of Alca-Lu can do better. Lord knows Cisco could
care less about code quality. surely some networking vendor must give a
sh*t.
Small brief from our ALU equipment evaluation:
BGP:4-byte
#
6 years by my count. The weird thing is I'm constantly running into
plenty of really smart competent people at Juniper who do want to help,
they just have no idea that things are really this broken, or they
aren't empowered to do anything about it. I guess you could call that
Thanks for all your help,
I cannot simply remove the disk nor the cf card,
the box is to far away.
I now tried to remove the disk from the boot list,
so it does not get initialized and the box completely runs
from CF - If that doesn't work I will try the other way (disabling
cf and enabling
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 03:38:45 am Humair Ali wrote:
i think most implementation use inclusive P-tunnels, as
it easier to manage but I personnaly think it add more
burden on the network.
I'm positive you're already familiar with all this, but just
for the archives:
Inclusive trees
Have you disabled adaptive standby? I can look up the configuration in a few if
you don't have it.
Sent from my iThing
On Jun 30, 2010, at 5:46 AM, Thomas Eichhorn t...@te3networks.de wrote:
Thanks for all your help,
I cannot simply remove the disk nor the cf card,
the box is to far away.
If you could give me a hint where to find it I would be really glad!
Tom
Am 30.06.2010 12:43, schrieb Jared Mauch:
Have you disabled adaptive standby? I can look up the configuration in a few
if you don't have it.
Sent from my iThing
On Jun 30, 2010, at 5:46 AM, Thomas Eichhorn
hahahaha nice!
From: Andrey Zarechansky zor...@fr.kiev.ua
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, June 30, 2010 3:26:50 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and MX Trio cards
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:50:49PM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote:
[dd]
How
Hey Mark
well ,
here is what I think, I have not got extensive experience in NG MVPN , I may
be wrong so feel free to contradict me, (just do it kindly ;-)
I think it depends on the size of your network ,to see which is more
appropriate, and the setup of the network.
The larger your network,
How about bloking their bgp route and instead redist'ing an aggregate
with a configured AS-Path. Not exactly the same but similar in the end
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:19:06PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi there..
Not the first time I've been told my proposition is technically
possible but to to ugly to execute ;-)
Phill
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Thanks for the replies
I follow what you're saying Phil but that's ugly.. no offense ;) We're
going to fire this back to the customer and tell them there's nothing we can
do I think we try our best to be hands off when it comes to customer
traffic involving BGP (except for typical
Is there any way that someone could tell me how to reproduce the stalled
route issue? How do I see if is happening etc?
We are about to purchase some mx's to replace our m series and would love to
nail this.
On Jun 30, 2010 7:35 AM, Derick Winkworth dwinkwo...@att.net wrote:
hahahaha nice!
When were you evaulating it? I think both of those two features have been
available for some time now, almost 2 years.
Not to say they do not have their own set of issues along with Juniper and
Cisco...
Phil
On Jun 30, 2010, at 4:26 AM, Andrey Zarechansky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:54:16AM -0400, Phil Bedard wrote:
When were you evaulating it? I think both of those two features have been
available for some time now, almost 2 years.
Less than a half year. What we had in the lab:
- few boxes 7750 SR-7, IOM2 based hw, running TiMOS
Hi everyone,
Suppose that I have redundant aggregation switches, S1 and S2. Every
access device gets an uplink from each. S1 and S2 have a trunk
between them. STP is running to break the loops. All of this is at
layer 2.
Is there any way to provide multihomed VPLS to some or all VLANs
On 30 June 2010 15:49, Chris Evans chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way that someone could tell me how to reproduce the stalled
route issue? How do I see if is happening etc?
We are about to purchase some mx's to replace our m series and would love to
nail this.
The question of
23 matches
Mail list logo
