Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade

2017-10-20 Thread craig washington
Thanks again for the feedback. So only NSR? What about GRES? From: Sachin Rai Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 2:51 AM To: craig washington; Elijah Zhuravlev Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Caio
*> Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?* No OSPF/ISIS just static routes pointing to their loopbacks. Cheers, Caio Em 20 de out de 2017 11:48 AM, "Daniel Rohan" escreveu: Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides? On

[j-nsp] Logical systems plus ldp/l2circuit

2017-10-20 Thread Caio
Hi again everyone, Another question I would like to ask for whoever worked with Lsys: Is ldp neighborhood supposed to work with Lsys? I have a scenario in which there is a physical MX104 router and I need to create an adjacency with a Lsys at a MX480 router, however after I enabled family mpls,

Re: [j-nsp] Logical systems plus ldp/l2circuit

2017-10-20 Thread Eduardo Schoedler
Em sáb, 21 de out de 2017 às 01:51, Caio escreveu: > Hi again everyone, > Another question I would like to ask for whoever worked with Lsys: > > Is ldp neighborhood supposed to work with Lsys? Yes, working here. Ending a vpls into a IRB interface for main instance. Lsys is

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Alexandre Guimaraes
MTU? RSVP ISIS/OSPF LDP neighborhood are ok? Loopback filters? att Alexandre Em 20 de out de 2017, à(s) 08:26, Caio > escreveu: Hello people, There's a weird problem I would like to share with you. I have the following scenario: MX104 -> L2 SW (1)

[j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Caio
Hello people, There's a weird problem I would like to share with you. I have the following scenario: MX104 -> L2 SW (1) -> L2 SW (2) -> MX80 Both L2 SW are Extreme X460 and they're doing nothing except forwarding frames at layer 2. In order to simplify our topology, we have changed the MX104

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Daniel Rohan
Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new port configured under protocols ldp and protocols mpls along with the loopback used for signaling? Do your control plane filters still permit ldp on

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Caio
Same MTU 9216. LDP neighborhood ok Same loopback filters, the only change was the L2 path. Cheers, Caio Em 20 de out de 2017 9:57 AM, "Alexandre Guimaraes" < alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com> escreveu: MTU? RSVP ISIS/OSPF LDP neighborhood are ok? Loopback filters? att Alexandre Em 20 de out

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Caio
> *Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new port configured under protocols ldp and protocols mpls along with the loopback used for signaling? * No. Both of the MX routers are using the same

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Daniel Rohan
Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides? On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:12 AM Daniel Rohan wrote: > Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology > change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new > port

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Aaron Gould
Why would you need rsvp for ldp ? I don't think they have dependency on each other... As I understand it, you can use RSVP for label advertisement, OR, you can use LDP for label advertisement. They are alternatives to each other. -Aaron ___

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Alain Hebert
    Well,     IS-IS or OSPF?     Q: And don't you need at least RSVP for the LDP signaling? But since he didn't change nothing beside the L2 switches...  Not relevant (maybe).     I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Alain Hebert
    Alphabet soup mistake =D.  I never had a need for LDP alone. - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443 On 10/20/17

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Saku Ytti
On 20 October 2017 at 19:39, wrote: Hey, >> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after >> 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre-Prod Lab. > > There's nothing magic about IS-IS. We've had IS-IS running through > Extreme switches many times

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread sthaug
>     I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after > 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre-Prod Lab. There's nothing magic about IS-IS. We've had IS-IS running through Extreme switches many times (still have one such adjacency in our lab, running through one X460

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade

2017-10-20 Thread Luis Balbinot
If possible try aiming for a full system restart, it will be less painful and very straightforward (you'll need at least a one hour window). Your PFEs will go through a warm reboot anyway if you upgrade the software on the new REs. But please confirm that with your SE. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit down one side/up another

2017-10-20 Thread Pavel Lunin
No TE, no problem. Extreme knows how to do it reeeally wrong :) At least, last time I checked. But yes, at the basic level it works. Adjacency, LSAs etc. 20 окт. 2017 г. 6:39 ПП пользователь написал: > I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after >