Thanks again for the feedback.
So only NSR? What about GRES?
From: Sachin Rai
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 2:51 AM
To: craig washington; Elijah Zhuravlev
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade
*> Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?*
No OSPF/ISIS just static routes pointing to their loopbacks.
Cheers,
Caio
Em 20 de out de 2017 11:48 AM, "Daniel Rohan" escreveu:
Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?
On
Hi again everyone,
Another question I would like to ask for whoever worked with Lsys:
Is ldp neighborhood supposed to work with Lsys?
I have a scenario in which there is a physical MX104 router and I need to
create an adjacency with a Lsys at a MX480 router, however after I enabled
family mpls,
Em sáb, 21 de out de 2017 às 01:51, Caio escreveu:
> Hi again everyone,
> Another question I would like to ask for whoever worked with Lsys:
>
> Is ldp neighborhood supposed to work with Lsys?
Yes, working here.
Ending a vpls into a IRB interface for main instance.
Lsys is
MTU?
RSVP ISIS/OSPF LDP neighborhood are ok?
Loopback filters?
att
Alexandre
Em 20 de out de 2017, à(s) 08:26, Caio
> escreveu:
Hello people,
There's a weird problem I would like to share with you.
I have the following scenario:
MX104 -> L2 SW (1)
Hello people,
There's a weird problem I would like to share with you.
I have the following scenario:
MX104 -> L2 SW (1) -> L2 SW (2) -> MX80
Both L2 SW are Extreme X460 and they're doing nothing except forwarding
frames at layer 2.
In order to simplify our topology, we have changed the MX104
Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology
change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new
port configured under protocols ldp and protocols mpls along with the
loopback used for signaling?
Do your control plane filters still permit ldp on
Same MTU 9216.
LDP neighborhood ok
Same loopback filters, the only change was the L2 path.
Cheers,
Caio
Em 20 de out de 2017 9:57 AM, "Alexandre Guimaraes" <
alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com> escreveu:
MTU?
RSVP ISIS/OSPF LDP neighborhood are ok?
Loopback filters?
att
Alexandre
Em 20 de out
> *Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology
change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new
port configured under protocols ldp and protocols mpls along with the
loopback used for signaling? *
No. Both of the MX routers are using the same
Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:12 AM Daniel Rohan wrote:
> Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology
> change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new
> port
Why would you need rsvp for ldp ? I don't think they have dependency on each
other... As I understand it, you can use RSVP for label advertisement, OR, you
can use LDP for label advertisement. They are alternatives to each other.
-Aaron
___
Well,
IS-IS or OSPF?
Q: And don't you need at least RSVP for the LDP signaling? But
since he didn't change nothing beside the L2 switches... Not relevant
(maybe).
I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
5m and used OSPF for that segment of our
Alphabet soup mistake =D. I never had a need for LDP alone.
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443
On 10/20/17
On 20 October 2017 at 19:39, wrote:
Hey,
>> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
>> 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre-Prod Lab.
>
> There's nothing magic about IS-IS. We've had IS-IS running through
> Extreme switches many times
> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
> 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre-Prod Lab.
There's nothing magic about IS-IS. We've had IS-IS running through
Extreme switches many times (still have one such adjacency in our lab,
running through one X460
If possible try aiming for a full system restart, it will be less
painful and very straightforward (you'll need at least a one hour
window). Your PFEs will go through a warm reboot anyway if you upgrade
the software on the new REs. But please confirm that with your SE.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at
No TE, no problem. Extreme knows how to do it reeeally wrong :) At least,
last time I checked.
But yes, at the basic level it works. Adjacency, LSAs etc.
20 окт. 2017 г. 6:39 ПП пользователь написал:
> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
>
17 matches
Mail list logo