On 6/Mar/18 10:32, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Hey Dejan, > > I wouldn't worry about this. The MTU check never should have existed > in pseudowire signalling. Fully agreed! > It's even vendor dependent how they > calculate they MTU, so you might have exactly correct MTU in A-B end, > but you will get MTU mismatch because they calculate different thing > in A and B end. > > I personally signal statically defined MTU, because that is more > transferrable, you may get B end which does not support ignore, but if > A end supports ignore + statically defined MTU, you can always get the > circuit up by just configuring A end correctly. > > There is absolutely no impact to dataplane in signalling the MTU > correctly or incorrectly, it's just misguided attempt to avoid > configuration mistakes. Agreed. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp