Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS MTU for pseudowires

2018-03-11 Thread Mark Tinka
On 6/Mar/18 10:32, Saku Ytti wrote: > Hey Dejan, > > I wouldn't worry about this. The MTU check never should have existed > in pseudowire signalling. Fully agreed! > It's even vendor dependent how they > calculate they MTU, so you might have exactly correct MTU in A-B end, > but you will get

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS MTU for pseudowires

2018-03-06 Thread Saku Ytti
What I mean some vendors report L3 MTU, some L2 MTU some something in between. So even if the actual MTU is same the signalled MTU's may mismatch and pseudowire fails to come up. So only reasonable thing is just to make sure the pseudowire MTU signalling does not matter, it gives no guarantees

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS MTU for pseudowires

2018-03-06 Thread Saku Ytti
Hey Dejan, I wouldn't worry about this. The MTU check never should have existed in pseudowire signalling. It's even vendor dependent how they calculate they MTU, so you might have exactly correct MTU in A-B end, but you will get MTU mismatch because they calculate different thing in A and B end.