Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-08 Thread Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp
All very good information. Thanks guys for all the replies. very helpful. On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 6:42 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 2/8/24 16:29, Saku Ytti wrote: > > In absence of more specifics, junos by default doesn't discard but > reject. > > > Right, which I wanted to clarify if it does

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-08 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 2/8/24 16:29, Saku Ytti wrote: In absence of more specifics, junos by default doesn't discard but reject. Right, which I wanted to clarify if it does the same thing with this specific feature, or if it does "discard" Mark. ___ juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-08 Thread Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 16:07, Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp wrote: > So internally, if it attracts any traffic for non-specific destinations, > does Junos send it /dev/null in hardware? I'd guess so... In absence of more specifics, junos by default doesn't discard but reject. There is essentially

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-08 Thread Jeff Haas via juniper-nsp
Correcting myself, yes, it’s discard. -- Jeff Juniper Business Use Only From: Mark Tinka Date: Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 9:07 AM To: Jeff Haas , Lee Starnes , "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements [External Email. Be cautious

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-08 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 2/8/24 15:48, Jeff Haas wrote: It’s rib-only.  If you wanted the usual other properties, you’d use the usual other features. So internally, if it attracts any traffic for non-specific destinations, does Junos send it /dev/null in hardware? I'd guess so... Mark.

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-08 Thread Jeff Haas via juniper-nsp
It’s rib-only. If you wanted the usual other properties, you’d use the usual other features. -- Jeff Juniper Business Use Only From: Mark Tinka Date: Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:14 AM To: Jeff Haas , Lee Starnes , "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204 an

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-07 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 2/6/24 19:42, Jeff Haas wrote: And for situations where you need it nailed up: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cli-reference/topics/ref/statement/bgp-static-edit-routing-options.html Interesting, never knew about this BGP-specific feature. What does the

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-06 Thread Jeff Haas via juniper-nsp
On 2/6/24, 11:55 AM, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp" mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > wrote: > Typically, BGP will not originate a route to its neighbors unless it > already exists

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-06 Thread Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp
Thanks Mark for the quick reply. That was the validation I was looking for. The TAC tech was really unsure about what he was doing and I had to guide him through things, So this is very helpful. Thanks again. -Lee On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:54 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 2/6/24 18:48, Lee

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements

2024-02-06 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 2/6/24 18:48, Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp wrote: Hello everyone, I was having difficulty in getting an announcement of a IPv6 /32 block using prefix-lists rather than redistribution of the IP addresses in from other protocols. We only have a couple /64 blocks in use at the moment but