Re: [jupyter] Clarifying intent of the kernel_gateway

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Peter Parente wrote: > I guess it depends on what "ready for production use" means to you. The > project has: > > - Unit tests and integration tests (https://github.com/jupyter/ > kernel_gateway/tree/master/kernel_gateway/tests) > -

Re: [jupyter] Clarifying intent of the kernel_gateway

> It sounds like both the kernel_gateway and the Jupyter Notebook server would both work for my purposes then. Most likely, yes. > Is the kernel_gateway ready for production use? I guess it depends on what "ready for production use" means to you. The project has: - Unit tests and

Re: [jupyter] Clarifying intent of the kernel_gateway

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > AFAIK yes, but I hope some of the people who built it will chime in. > > Bumping this in case Peter Parente or some of the other folks on that team have extra info? -- Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org)

Re: [jupyter] Clarifying intent of the kernel_gateway

On 5 April 2017 at 16:39, 'Bergam' via Project Jupyter < jupyter@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Is the kernel_gateway ready for production use? AFAIK yes, but I hope some of the people who built it will chime in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [jupyter] Clarifying intent of the kernel_gateway

Thanks, Thomas! It sounds like both the kernel_gateway and the Jupyter Notebook server would both work for my purposes then. Is the kernel_gateway ready for production use? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Jupyter" group. To unsubscribe

[jupyter] Clarifying intent of the kernel_gateway

I'm interested in using the "kernel_gateway" (https://github.com/jupyter/kernel_gateway) for re-architecting an existing Notebooks application, but I'm confused whether "kernel_gateway" supports my use case. All I really need is a headless notebook server. I already have a simple UI for