On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:31 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:19 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 12/12/2010 05:02 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
Rémi's synchronized block only coordinates the activities of
updaters.
Other threads may, and in some cases may have to, see some of the
setTarget
On Dec 10, 9:04 pm, John Rose john.r.r...@oracle.com wrote:
On Dec 10, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Doug Lea wrote:
On 12/09/10 19:09, John Rose wrote:
I started a thread on Google Groups to get more advice on safepoint-based
invalidation, which the EG is naming MutableCallSite#sync.
On Apr 20, 1:08 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
since quite a while I am looking for the best approach to tackle the Groovy
speed problem, but it seems I will not be able to fully solve the
On Dec 20, 8:37 pm, Martin C. Martin mar...@martincmartin.com
wrote:
Per Bothner wrote:
On 12/17/2009 09:02 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I may be naive, but what we really want here is simply a set of common
protocols for doing the following:
* Requesting from a language what types
On Dec 21, 1:50 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
Generating .class files isn't necessarily 'overkill'. I agree with
Per, this is a standard representation. Given such .class files in the
classpath
On Dec 21, 3:54 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
Perhaps we should take a deep breath before proceeding. Ready?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 21, 1:50 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
I'm not sure
On Nov 16, 11:09 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:45 PM, John Cowan johnwco...@gmail.com wrote:
In the end the answer will be fixnums. As things stand, Integers are
so slow that BigIntegers aren't much slower: consequently, I decided,
since I
On Sep 30, 4:54 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking for papers, references, descriptions of methodologies for
caching data out of a mutable hierarchy. Anyone got some pointers?
Basically in JRuby we have lots of untapped caching opportunities, for
methods,
On Sep 16, 5:08 am, Jeroen Frijters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attila Szegedi wrote:
On Sep 16, 2008, at 3:15 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
How is everyone handling the filtering of synthetic/bridge methods?
[...]
Most interesting, especially considering that bridge methods are really
only
How is everyone handling the filtering of synthetic/bridge methods?
Using the reflection API, I'm seeing differences between JDK 1.5 and
6, with methods like StringBuilder.length marked as bridge/synthetic
in JDK 6 (!?)
Is there a reliable way to deduce the 'real' method set via
reflection?
On May 20, 8:59 am, Ola Bini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich Hickey wrote:
Thanks! Still working through it, but a fundamental question:
Why does invokedynamic mirror invokevirtual, esp. in looking like an
instance method call? Isn't a multi-language extension point like
invokedynamic
On Apr 30, 2:06 am, Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a friendly merger might be possible?
I think peaceful coexistence is more likely. Clojure has certainly
ceded the backwards-compatibility ground.
There was a time (you may not remember) when I was considering either
On Apr 29, 5:36 pm, Jochen Theodorou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to collect a bit data to how you avoid boxing in your language
implementations. I am asking because currently Groovy makes lots of
calls via Reflection, and that means creating for each call an Object[],
On Apr 29, 8:44 pm, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 17:15, Rich Hickey wrote:
...
Hi Randall,
I recommend you also take a look at Clojure. ...
You might want to get Clojure listed here:
http://www.robert-tolksdorf.de/vmlanguages.html
Clojure Status
Clojure is a dynamic, compiled, functional dialect of Lisp for the
JVM, with strong concurrency support.
Clojure has been in development for 2.5 years. In public release for 6
months, there has been a lot of interest - 2500+ downloads, and 270+
members of the Google Group,
On Apr 18, 1:33 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've been approved to do a talk at CommunityOne this year on how we
all have been trying to bring JVM language implementers together. The
general idea is to show that the sleeping giant of languages on the
JVM is starting to
16 matches
Mail list logo
