Re: [jvm-l] IonMonkey

2011-05-10 Thread Thomas E Enebo
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Hannes Wallnoefer hann...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/10 Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com: It would work, but would rarely be applicable for production code. Better is to do what JVM does and mark the previous revision of the hidden class as not entrant,

Re: [jvm-l] Perl 5 on the JVM (reasons why not)

2010-05-25 Thread Thomas E Enebo
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Brian Hurt bhur...@gmail.com wrote: I think the lesson here is make your language unparseable, and no one will be able to parse it.  My advice to people designing new languages is

[jvm-l] Re: Binary build of MLVM available

2009-04-20 Thread Thomas E Enebo
You rock! Thanks...and now build them forever more for all of us as the changesets come in :) -Tom On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Attila Szegedi szege...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I managed to build a MLVM binary today for Mac OS X 10.5 with Intel CPUs. As I'm not a Sun employee, I can

[jvm-l] Re: Top five languages

2008-04-25 Thread Thomas E Enebo
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:26 AM, rssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: May be it takes sense to speak about 'concept dimensions'. From 'well-known concepts': scripting/ Groovy, JavaFX, JavaScript functional/ Scala, Hascel (business objects has java implementation as .. CAL)