BTW, hello to all. I'm a programmer in st. louis, mo.
See Ya,
Nick Neuberger
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivek Venugopalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 11:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Jwebunit-development] Re: Code co
Jim
Yes 80% was a surprise. But I agree with you on the
actual % not being a big thing as compared to what is
being covered. jWebUnit will be goverened by the
80:20 rule as like anybody else. ie probably 20% of
our code is the critical path.
So is the 80% coverage really the "ideal" 80% is the
Well,
That's a good percentage - a bit better than I would have expected.
Application of a test coverage tool is nice - presumably it can drill down
on the packages a bit more and show us where the misses mostly are. The
Pseudo Server borrowed from jWebUnit is a pain to maintain a copy of, bu
