[kaffe] 'mktemp' check in configure (or kaffe shell script does not work)

2003-09-30 Thread Kiyo Inaba
Hi, As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script. This command is used in 'kaffe' shell script and if we don't have mktemp (well, this is the case for me on Solaris) the final 'kaffe'

[kaffe] Re: 'mktemp' check in configure (or kaffe shell script does not work)

2003-09-30 Thread Kiyo Inaba
Oops, my previous report is too terse. I said, As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script. This command is used in 'kaffe' shell script and if we don't have mktemp (well, this is the

[kaffe] Re: 'mktemp' check in configure (or kaffe shell script does not work)

2003-09-30 Thread Kiyo Inaba
Hi again, Since mktemp command in 'www.mktemp.org' is BSD style license, aren't there any possibilities to include it into kaffe tree? Kiyo ___ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe

Re: [kaffe] Re: 'mktemp' check in configure (or kaffe shell script does not work)

2003-09-30 Thread Helmer Krämer
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:53:33 +0900 (JST) Kiyo Inaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I said, As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script. This command is used in 'kaffe' shell script

Re: [kaffe] huge number of 'sleep' processes

2003-09-30 Thread Jim Pick
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:52:24 +1200 M.Negovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i am having trouble while running 'make check' on netbsd/i386. No mater what number of max user processes i set its never enough and i always get 'cant fork' error. Now quick look at top while running 'make check'

Re: [kaffe] Feature freeze for 1.1.2

2003-09-30 Thread Jim Pick
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:42:36 -0400 Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Pick wrote: Hi, Just a reminder - we're in a feature freeze now, for the 1.1.2 release that I'm going to try to make next Sunday (Oct. 5). So, please try to do some testing, if you've got time, and

Re: [kaffe] Goodbye for Now

2003-09-30 Thread Jim Pick
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:55:06 -0400 (EDT) Rob Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I've had a great time working on the project on and off for the past year or so. As some of you know, I've been sortof in limbo lately, moving around the east coast of the US without much access to my

Re: [kaffe] CVS kaffe (hkraemer): fixes and improvement for the garbage collector

2003-09-30 Thread Jim Pick
fixes and improvement for the garbage collector * fixed the endless loop in startGC when running javalayer 0.3.0 * (hopefully) made the heap management more efficient Excellent! We needed that. I'll have to test freenet again to see if it helps. Cheers, - Jim

[kaffe] just-in-time question

2003-09-30 Thread jycheng
excuse me: I want to understand that how JITworks , so thatI can researchin translating bytecode to x86 native code. Can you introduce to me some documents about JIT compiler? thanks!

[kaffe] CVS kaffe (hkraemer): fixes for arm-linux jit engine

2003-09-30 Thread Kaffe CVS
PatchSet 4083 Date: 2003/09/30 19:50:52 Author: hkraemer Branch: HEAD Tag: (none) Log: fixes for arm-linux jit engine It compiles without warnings using gcc 3.2.2, but crashes at runtime, hope to fix it, though. Members: ChangeLog:1.1678-1.1679 config/arm/common.h:1.6-1.7

Re: [kaffe] huge number of 'sleep' processes

2003-09-30 Thread M.Negovanovic
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:48:20AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote: It sounds like the changes I made to TestScript.in to create a killer process to kill off long-running tests. I guess I'm doing something non-portable. :-( hmm yes! :) Does anybody have an idea what I did wrong? When a test