Hi,
As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check
for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script.
This command is used in 'kaffe' shell script and if we don't have mktemp
(well, this is the case for me on Solaris) the final 'kaffe'
Oops, my previous report is too terse.
I said,
As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check
for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script.
This command is used in 'kaffe' shell script and if we don't have mktemp
(well, this is the
Hi again,
Since mktemp command in 'www.mktemp.org' is BSD style license, aren't there
any possibilities to include it into kaffe tree?
Kiyo
___
kaffe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:53:33 +0900 (JST)
Kiyo Inaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I said,
As the subject line says, configure.in version 1.200 introduced existence check
for 'mktemp' command, but it does not change anything for configure script.
This command is used in 'kaffe' shell script
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:52:24 +1200
M.Negovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i am having trouble while running 'make check' on netbsd/i386. No mater
what number of max user processes i set its never enough and i always
get 'cant fork' error. Now quick look at top while running 'make check'
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:42:36 -0400
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Pick wrote:
Hi,
Just a reminder - we're in a feature freeze now, for the 1.1.2 release
that I'm going to try to make next Sunday (Oct. 5).
So, please try to do some testing, if you've got time, and
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:55:06 -0400 (EDT)
Rob Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I've had a great time working on the project on and off for the past year
or so. As some of you know, I've been sortof in limbo lately, moving
around the east coast of the US without much access to my
fixes and improvement for the garbage collector
* fixed the endless loop in startGC when running javalayer 0.3.0
* (hopefully) made the heap management more efficient
Excellent! We needed that.
I'll have to test freenet again to see if it helps.
Cheers,
- Jim
excuse me:
I want to understand that how JITworks , so thatI can
researchin translating bytecode to x86 native code.
Can you introduce to me some documents about JIT compiler?
thanks!
PatchSet 4083
Date: 2003/09/30 19:50:52
Author: hkraemer
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
fixes for arm-linux jit engine
It compiles without warnings using gcc 3.2.2, but crashes
at runtime, hope to fix it, though.
Members:
ChangeLog:1.1678-1.1679
config/arm/common.h:1.6-1.7
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:48:20AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
It sounds like the changes I made to TestScript.in to create a killer
process to kill off long-running tests. I guess I'm doing something
non-portable. :-(
hmm yes! :)
Does anybody have an idea what I did wrong? When a test
11 matches
Mail list logo