Re: [kaffe] [gump] utf8const.c

Helmer Krämer wrote: Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Helmer Krämer wrote: Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: looks like we need a lock for locking access to utfLockRoot :( I'd think that the whole utfLockRoot thing is broken (you'd need one utfLockRoot per thread since it's pe

Re: [kaffe] [gump] utf8const.c

Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Helmer Krämer wrote: > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>looks like we need a lock for locking access to utfLockRoot :( > >> > > > > > > I'd think that the whole utfLockRoot thing is broken (you'd > > need one utfLockRoot per

Re: [kaffe] [gump] utf8const.c

Helmer Krämer wrote: Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: looks like we need a lock for locking access to utfLockRoot :( I'd think that the whole utfLockRoot thing is broken (you'd need one utfLockRoot per thread since it's perfectly legal for two threads to work on utf8 constants at the s

Re: [kaffe] [gump] utf8const.c

Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looks like we need a lock for locking access to utfLockRoot :( > I'd think that the whole utfLockRoot thing is broken (you'd need one utfLockRoot per thread since it's perfectly legal for two threads to work on utf8 constants at the same time). Howev

[kaffe] [gump] utf8const.c

looks like we need a lock for locking access to utfLockRoot :( -- dims --- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guilhem, > > As per your instructions on IRC, i tried the patch below...no luck. am still > getting with > commons-io. It's very intermittent. so i just keep running "ant >