Re: General question

2000-04-12 Thread Chris Gray
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Mo DeJong wrote: The "best" thing for you to do is write your code on your desktop with the Sun JDK 1.2 installed. Then when your code is finished and you have created your regression tests, compile and run the same code on Kaffe (the GPLed version). If the code does

Re: General question

2000-04-12 Thread Mo DeJong
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Chris Gray wrote: On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Mo DeJong wrote: The "best" thing for you to do is write your code on your desktop with the Sun JDK 1.2 installed. Then when your code is finished and you have created your regression tests, compile and run the same code

Re: General question

2000-04-12 Thread Archie Cobbs
Alexandre Oliva writes: Is it more advanced than the GPL version? Or is it a stable, thus older, version of the opensourced version we all have? No, it's a clean room implementation. The bottom line being "are they completely different products?". Yes. I don't think they're

Re: General question (about Kaffe CE)

2000-04-12 Thread Ganesh Sivaraman
Hello everyone, Yes, there r two version of Kaffe. Desktop and Custom Edition. Desktop as name says can straight away work with your Windows or X server environment. Custom, which I have been working with for w while, is the one which gives the complete flexibilty of running Kaffe ontop of

Re: General question

2000-04-12 Thread Archie Cobbs
Chris Gray writes: The "best" thing for you to do is write your code on your desktop with the Sun JDK 1.2 installed. Then when your code is finished and you have created your regression tests, compile and run the same code on Kaffe (the GPLed version). If the code does not compile with

OT: Classpath was Re: General question

2000-04-11 Thread Stuart Ballard
Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: Thanks a lot for the answer. Other: What's te status of classpath.org ? No news since along time, now. You should really ask this on the classpath list, but here's my take on it (I follow the list but I haven't been closely involved with the project for a couple of

Re: General question

2000-04-11 Thread Julien Dumesnil
SNIP And in these areas, what's the status of Kaffe? Is it JVM 1.2 compliant? No, at least not the GPL version. I know that at least java.lang.ref and Java2D are missing - somebody more knowledgeable can possibly elaborate more on that. Hum... could you clarify that? Does it mean that

Re: General question

2000-04-11 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julien Dumesnil writes: And in these areas, what's the status of Kaffe? Is it JVM 1.2 compliant? No, at least not the GPL version. I know that at least java.lang.ref and Java2D are missing - somebody more knowledgeable can possibly elaborate more on that. Hum... could you clarify

Re: General question

2000-04-11 Thread Artur Biesiadowski
Julien Dumesnil wrote: Hum... could you clarify that? Does it mean that there's another version of kaffe that is not in the GPL? There is also a Kaffe Custom Edition, which runs on embedded systems and have some goodies in it - for example I've heard that dos version has it's own AWT

Re: General question

2000-04-11 Thread Julien Dumesnil
PRE: that's a 2 in 1 followup to what Archie and Artur wrote: Julien Dumesnil writes: Hum... could you clarify that? Does it mean that there's another version of kaffe that is not in the GPL? On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote: Yes.. see http://www.transvirtual.com. They have a

Re: General question

2000-04-11 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julien Dumesnil writes: Is it more advanced than the GPL version? Or is it a stable, thus older, version of the opensourced version we all have? Did they sign some agreement with Sun to port their JVM? No, it's a clean room implementation. The bottom line being "are they completely