On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 02:11 PM, Konstantin Veretennicov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>
> So what _is_ the status of testing on Windows?
>
> Well, at the moment it is "A few tests are failing regularly and a few
On 03/23/2016 02:11 PM, Konstantin Veretennicov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
So what _is_ the status of testing on Windows?
Well, at the moment it is "A few tests are failing regularly and a few
are flaky".
If interested in details, see 3 test runs for revisio
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Dominik Ruf wrote:
> I created a repository. You can find the jenkins job-dsl-plugin
> configuration at https://bitbucket.org/domruf/jenkins-kallithea-
> docker/src. The repository also includes the docker configuration I use.
Good to be able to see your configur
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> So what _is_ the status of testing on Windows?
Well, at the moment it is "A few tests are failing regularly and a few
are flaky".
If interested in details, see 3 test runs for revision
https://bitbucket.org/conservancy/kallithea/commits/b0
New issue 200: CRSF Check Failing (403) on Form Submit
http://link.bitbucket.org/wf/click?upn=8USRlNyft-2BCzk2l4Ywl6gBN6O2ZFCgViYAU6dOoIHIPp6EEjgcMf3vvydwpEVPBH11s-2FaHLV0NhKXZoC41HywKiEGExC0VBdlNGsOb8fnAk-2FdzUKXsqoh52xdZ2lME4mgIWyI5QXHHxN08dPyd2G4A-3D-3D_7V-2FmRl-2BatdmBwUBFXbsB13NVJlEXqBigXyxfn0
So what _is_ the status of testing on Windows? Is it passing in some
setups or everywhere? Is anything missing to get a good baseline? Are
there any actual bugs?
/Mads
___
kallithea-general mailing list
kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org
http://lists
On 03/23/2016 12:25 PM, Konstantin Veretennicov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire
wrote:
Hi,
Jan Heylen recently mentioned an automatic python code quality checking tool
to me:
https://www.quantifiedcode.com/
It's free, works with bitbucket (as per their faq) an
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jan Heylen recently mentioned an automatic python code quality checking tool
> to me:
> https://www.quantifiedcode.com/
>
> It's free, works with bitbucket (as per their faq) and sounds interesting.
Sounds interesting inde
pullrequests: show status label for reviews instead of the raw internal string
kiilerix committed on 2016-03-23 17:27:50branch: defaulttag: tipchangeset: b027fc1apullrequests: show status label for reviews instead of the raw internal string
M kallithea/templates/pullrequests/pullrequest_d
On 03/23/2016 09:03 AM, Dominik Ruf wrote:
I think it is worth a shot.
But I'd suggest to use a fork.
In case the they are flooding us with pull requests.
BTW the default settings of pylint report 23956 violations :-)
http://jenkins.dominikruf.com/job/Kallithea/job/kallithea-
scm.org/violations/
I think it is worth a shot.
But I'd suggest to use a fork.
In case the they are flooding us with pull requests.
BTW the default settings of pylint report 23956 violations :-)
http://jenkins.dominikruf.com/job/Kallithea/job/kallithea-
scm.org/violations/
___
On 03/23/2016 03:55 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
Hi,
Jan Heylen recently mentioned an automatic python code quality
checking tool to me:
https://www.quantifiedcode.com/
It's free, works with bitbucket (as per their faq) and sounds interesting.
What do you think about it, should we try
Hi,
Jan Heylen recently mentioned an automatic python code quality checking
tool to me:
https://www.quantifiedcode.com/
It's free, works with bitbucket (as per their faq) and sounds interesting.
What do you think about it, should we try and set it up?
Thanks,
Thomas
13 matches
Mail list logo
