Re: What should be included in 1.0

2018-03-17 Thread Dominik Ruf
Thanks you all for your feedback. The important one is missing though :-( @Mads: Do you, as the project lead, really have nothing to say about this? Dominik Ruf schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018 um 18:54 Uhr: > Hi all, > > we discussed in the past that we are long over due to release a new > version

Re: What should be included in 1.0

2018-03-13 Thread Arun Chandrasekaran
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Dominik Ruf wrote: > Hi all, > > we discussed in the past that we are long over due to release a new version. > We also agreed that we should strongly push towards a 1.0 release. > Since this may attract new users, I think we should carefully think about > what sh

Re: What should be included in 1.0

2018-03-13 Thread Jani Tiainen
Hi all, I've used (and still use) both Trac and Redmine. For example Django project is using Trac rather successfully. They have some in-house customizations but not much over standard trac. In work I first used Trac and after number of projects got bigger we changed to Redmine. In the end both

Re: What should be included in 1.0

2018-03-13 Thread Nicolas Pinault
I only know openproject from the time it was still an app, some years ago. If the focus is on real timelines, then I don't think it is needed to have this kind of tools. What we'd need IMHO is to be able to define the upcoming release(s) and their scope. A tool like trac can

Re: What should be included in 1.0

2018-03-13 Thread Dominik Ruf
Thomas De Schampheleire schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018 um 20:37 Uhr: > 2018-03-12 18:54 GMT+01:00 Dominik Ruf : > > Hi all, > > > > we discussed in the past that we are long over due to release a new > version. > > We also agreed that we should strongly push towards a 1.0 release. > > Since this m

Re: What should be included in 1.0

2018-03-12 Thread Thomas De Schampheleire
2018-03-12 18:54 GMT+01:00 Dominik Ruf : > Hi all, > > we discussed in the past that we are long over due to release a new version. > We also agreed that we should strongly push towards a 1.0 release. > Since this may attract new users, I think we should carefully think about > what should be inclu