[kbibtex-bugs] [bug #20407] Dynamic crossref resolution

2016-10-24 Thread Bug reports as they are filed. No direct posts allowed, use bug report instead
Update of bug #20407 (project kbibtex):

  Status: In Progress => Duplicate  
 Open/Closed:Open => Closed 

___

Follow-up Comment #8:

I have transferred this issue to the KDE tracker:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371558

Marking as duplicate here.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
kbibtex-bugs mailing list
kbibtex-bugs@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-bugs


[kbibtex-bugs] [bug #20407] Dynamic crossref resolution

2016-10-23 Thread Bug reports as they are filed. No direct posts allowed, use bug report instead
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #20407 (project kbibtex):

Thomas?

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
kbibtex-bugs mailing list
kbibtex-bugs@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-bugs


[kbibtex-bugs] [bug #20407] Dynamic crossref resolution

2016-09-19 Thread Bug reports as they are filed. No direct posts allowed, use bug report instead
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #20407 (project kbibtex):

I spoke too soon, sorry.

The issue is complicated a bit by the fact that xdata fields can contain a
comma-separated list of multiple xdata references.

This patch accounts for that, too.

(file #28665)
___

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: 20407-3.diff   Size:22 KB


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
kbibtex-bugs mailing list
kbibtex-bugs@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-bugs


[kbibtex-bugs] [bug #20407] Dynamic crossref resolution

2016-09-18 Thread Bug reports as they are filed. No direct posts allowed, use bug report instead
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #20407 (project kbibtex):

This is the last modification (promised!). Since, in theory, xdata references
could be infinitely recursive (entry a contains xdata ref towards entry b,
which contains xdata ref towards entry a...), I have added a safe-guard that
checks each xdata patch is only followed once.

(file #28656)
___

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: 20407-2.diff   Size:21 KB


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
kbibtex-bugs mailing list
kbibtex-bugs@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-bugs


[kbibtex-bugs] [bug #20407] Dynamic crossref resolution

2016-09-18 Thread Bug reports as they are filed. No direct posts allowed, use bug report instead
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #20407 (project kbibtex):

Please use file #28654 instead.
The previous patch contained a small typo.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
kbibtex-bugs mailing list
kbibtex-bugs@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-bugs


[kbibtex-bugs] [bug #20407] Dynamic crossref resolution

2013-01-06 Thread Bug reports as they are filed. No direct posts allowed, use bug report instead
Update of bug #20407 (project kbibtex):

  Status:None = Confirmed  

___

Follow-up Comment #1:

I added this bug as a dependency to bug report 18662 for now.

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/bugs/?20407

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
kbibtex-bugs mailing list
kbibtex-bugs@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-bugs