[kbuild-devel] RE: Maintainers master list?

2001-06-26 Thread Robert Love
On 26 Jun 2001 16:03:05 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Holzrichter, Bruce wrote: > > > respect Eric, and all the developers work. How about starting > > with a simple MAINTAINERS file maintainer? Someone to actively > > follow project developers and contact info? > > That's

[kbuild-devel] RE: Maintainers master list?

2001-06-26 Thread Holzrichter, Bruce
>What happens now when somebody takes over responsibility for a file >or subsystem and the MAINTAINERS file doesn't get patched, either because >that person forgets to send a MAINTAINERS update or Linus doesn't >happen to take the MAINTAINERS patch for a while? >What happens when I look at a fi

Re: [kbuild-devel] Draft transition plan

2001-06-26 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Eric S. Raymond wrote: > >3. Transition patch #3 -- Cleanup > >The third patch will change the format of .config slightly so that >"no" answers are stored explicitly, FOO=n rather than "# FOO is not set." >It will also clean up after any unanticipated interactions between 1 and 2: > >Configurat

Re: [kbuild-devel] Addition to roadmap

2001-06-26 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Eric S. Raymond wrote > >Giacomo, what's the status of your autoprobe utility? Is merging this >in step 5? > The autoprobe works fine (with your CML2). Now it detect nearly all PCI, USB, ISA PnP devices, plus a lots of more kind of drivers (net, console, ...) I should still make small changes t