[kbuild-devel] Mail looping back from garaged.homeip.net

2002-08-20 Thread Keith Owens
garaged.homeip.net is looping mail from the linux-kernel list back to the kbuild list. Posts from this site to kbuild are now being held. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - please fix this looping mail server ASAP. --- Forwarded Message Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourc

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

2002-08-20 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Greg Banks wrote: > > I have to manually fix things like CONFIG_ALPHA_NONAME, which is first set > > by a choice statement and later redefined. My new parser can't deal with > > this, because user input is given the highest priority. > > Well then, there's something we n

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

2002-08-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:48:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Banks) wrote on 19.08.02 in ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101387128818052&w=2 > > David Woodhouse gives an idea of what would be necessary to get a new > >

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

2002-08-20 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Banks) wrote on 19.08.02 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101387128818052&w=2 > David Woodhouse gives an idea of what would be necessary to get a new > language+parser accepted. Can you achieve that yet? As for the idea of a

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

2002-08-20 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > David suggest to use randomly generated configurations, but they lack > one important feature. They are always valid, and a new system shall > be able to deal with hand-edited .config files in the same way as > oldconfig. I suggested those as a way for testing the equi

Re: [kbuild-devel] RFC: kernel config: new dependency syntax

2002-08-20 Thread Greg Banks
Peter Samuelson wrote: > > My current implementation of if_dep is *not*, as previously theorised, > a drop-in two-way replacement for adding dependencies to the end of > dep_* statements. I currently have it short-circuiting, so statements > are in effect *not* executing in the 'n' case (or the

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

2002-08-20 Thread Greg Banks
Roman Zippel wrote: > > I looked through the list and except from real syntax errors nothing > prevents an automatic conversion. > I have to manually fix things like CONFIG_ALPHA_NONAME, which is first set > by a choice statement and later redefined. My new parser can't deal with > this, because