garaged.homeip.net is looping mail from the linux-kernel list back to
the kbuild list. Posts from this site to kbuild are now being held.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - please fix this looping mail server ASAP.
--- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourc
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Greg Banks wrote:
> > I have to manually fix things like CONFIG_ALPHA_NONAME, which is first set
> > by a choice statement and later redefined. My new parser can't deal with
> > this, because user input is given the highest priority.
>
> Well then, there's something we n
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:48:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Banks) wrote on 19.08.02 in
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101387128818052&w=2
> > David Woodhouse gives an idea of what would be necessary to get a new
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Banks) wrote on 19.08.02 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101387128818052&w=2
> David Woodhouse gives an idea of what would be necessary to get a new
> language+parser accepted. Can you achieve that yet?
As for the idea of a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> David suggest to use randomly generated configurations, but they lack
> one important feature. They are always valid, and a new system shall
> be able to deal with hand-edited .config files in the same way as
> oldconfig.
I suggested those as a way for testing the equi
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> My current implementation of if_dep is *not*, as previously theorised,
> a drop-in two-way replacement for adding dependencies to the end of
> dep_* statements. I currently have it short-circuiting, so statements
> are in effect *not* executing in the 'n' case (or the
Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> I looked through the list and except from real syntax errors nothing
> prevents an automatic conversion.
> I have to manually fix things like CONFIG_ALPHA_NONAME, which is first set
> by a choice statement and later redefined. My new parser can't deal with
> this, because