Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> I'm still not happy at least for the ".config does not exist" case. Since
Easy, maintain the 2.4 behavior, which is sane :)
Jeff
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
h
Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> AFAICS, "quiet" only means the same thing as the traditional "make
> oldconfig", but suppressing questions where the answers are known. (Which
> I think is fine)
yeah, that's fine with me too
> I was just referring to the fo
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> I'm still not happy at least for the ".config does not exist" case. Since
> when I forget to "cp ../config-2.5 .config", I don't really want "make
> oldconfig", I want to do the forgotten cp.
Adding this check to the silent mode is trivial.
b
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> > One cosmetic thing I mentioned to Roman, Config.new needs to be changed
> > to something better, like conf.in or build.conf or somesuch.
>
> I agree. (But I'm not particularly good at coming up with names ;)
> build.conf is maybe not too bad
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >
> >>One cosmetic thing I mentioned to Roman, Config.new needs to be changed
> >>to something better, like conf.in or build.conf or somesuch.
> >
> >
> > I agree. (But I'm no
Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>>One cosmetic thing I mentioned to Roman, Config.new needs to be changed
>>to something better, like conf.in or build.conf or somesuch.
>
>
> I agree. (But I'm not particularly good at coming up with names ;)
> build.con
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> One cosmetic thing I mentioned to Roman, Config.new needs to be changed
> to something better, like conf.in or build.conf or somesuch.
I agree. (But I'm not particularly good at coming up with names ;)
build.conf is maybe not too bad considering that t
One cosmetic thing I mentioned to Roman, Config.new needs to be changed
to something better, like conf.in or build.conf or somesuch.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > I have been working on integrating lkc with kbuild.
> > Here is the result.
>
> Thanks, nice work. :)
Yup, I improved things a bit further.
> > Rules.make
> > - Added infrastructure to support host-ccprogs, in other words
> > support tools written
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I have been working on integrating lkc with kbuild.
> Here is the result.
Thanks, nice work. :)
> Rules.make
> - Added infrastructure to support host-ccprogs, in other words
> support tools written (partly) in c++.
There are all compiled with g
10 matches
Mail list logo