[kbuild-devel] Re: UML kbuild patch

2002-09-23 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > The actual executable UML generates is called "linux" anyway, so its > Makefile can have its own rule (as for other archs the boot images) > which builds "linux" from "vmlinux" using gcc and the link script. - > I.e. the same way as UML used to do it earlier, anyway.

[kbuild-devel] UML kbuild patch

2002-09-23 Thread Jeff Dike
The UML build needs a few kbuild changes in order to work with the latest stuff. Since kbuild now enforces the use of the linker script on the vmlinux build, UML can't use its old two-stage link, where vmlinux is a normal relocatable object file which is linked into the linux bina

[kbuild-devel] Re: UML kbuild patch

2002-09-23 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Jeff Dike wrote: > The UML build needs a few kbuild changes in order to work with the latest > stuff. > > Since kbuild now enforces the use of the linker script on the vmlinux build, > UML can't use its old two-stage link, where > vmlinux is a normal relocatable object

Re: [kbuild-devel] scripts/Configure and 'int'

2002-09-23 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:04:41AM +1000, Greg Banks wrote: > [...catching up on last few week's email...] > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > Hello. Cufrrently in both 2.4 ad 2.5, scripts/Configure implements > > optional min/max arguments for the 'int' keyword. > > There are two problems however, fir

Re: [kbuild-devel] scripts/Configure and 'int'

2002-09-23 Thread Greg Banks
[...catching up on last few week's email...] Tom Rini wrote: > > Hello. Cufrrently in both 2.4 ad 2.5, scripts/Configure implements > optional min/max arguments for the 'int' keyword. > There are two problems however, first being that the spec, as defined in > Documentation/kbuild/config-langua

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.6

2002-09-23 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Zippel wrote: > > I intentionally only printed a message and errored out in this case, and I > > think that's more useful, particularly for people doing > > > > make all 2>&1 > make.log > > > > which now may take forever waiting for input. > > You should have tried thi

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 0.6

2002-09-23 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:36:25PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > > > scripts/lkc/Makefile* > > > - As kbuild does not distingush between individual objects, > > > used for a given target, but (try to) build them all, I have > > > found a solution where I create one Makefile for each execut