On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
I agree, but we know some strange 'behaviour' of MS.
They have a lot of lawers, they can make us a lot of trouble.
(You will notice that there are no copyright statment on that file,
only the name of authors).
Remember the RMS (a flame with
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
The design reason is that having a single file with all the symbol-to-prompt
mappings in it is really helpful when you want to localize the rulebase for
another language. I'm still leaning towards keeping symbols.cml together
just to make it
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
You're almost right. If you counted only explicit constraints,
created by require statements, you get a bunch of cliques that
aren't that large.
Unfortunatelythere are a huge bunch of implicit constraints
created by dependency
