[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.1 is available

2002-04-22 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Sunday 21 April 2002 09:43, Keith Owens wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Release 2.1 of kernel build for kernel 2.5 (kbuild 2.5) is available. http://sourceforge.net/projects/kbuild/, Package kbuild-2.5, download release 2.1. Hi Keith, Have you got an update on

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.1 is available

2002-04-22 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 01:00, Keith Owens wrote: On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:32:35 +0200, Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 21 April 2002 09:43, Keith Owens wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Release 2.1 of kernel build for kernel 2.5 (kbuild 2.5

[kbuild-devel] Re: Disgusted with kbuild developers

2002-02-18 Thread Daniel Phillips
. A Microsoft engineer wrote scripts/Configure. For three years, I have lived in fear that Microsoft would notice this fact and use it to attack Linux through public relations channels or legal means. They haven't yet, so I have been wrong so far. Teehee. I don't think you have

[kbuild-devel] Re: CML2-2.1.3 is available

2002-01-21 Thread Daniel Phillips
On January 15, 2002 08:37 pm, Rob Landley wrote: On Tuesday 15 January 2002 03:25 pm, Russell King wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:53:24PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: * The `vitality' flag is gone from the language. Instead, the autoprober detects the type of your root

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2-2.1.3 is available

2002-01-21 Thread Daniel Phillips
On January 21, 2002 06:05 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: Daniel Phillips wrote: I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be make autoconfig? Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above. Yes. It should be make autoconfig, for symmterty reasons :-) I called

Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5

2001-12-04 Thread Daniel Phillips
On December 4, 2001 05:52 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: I don't think esr changed non problematic rules, but one: all rules without help become automatically dependent to CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. I don't like it, but I understand why he makes this decision. I love it. -- Daniel

Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5

2001-12-04 Thread Daniel Phillips
On December 4, 2001 06:50 pm, Daniel Phillips wrote: On December 4, 2001 05:52 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: I don't think esr changed non problematic rules, but one: all rules without help become automatically dependent to CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. I don't like it, but I understand why he