Brendan J Simon wrote:
Keith Owens wrote:
Does anyone know how Linux distros (debian, redhat, etc) populate the
linux header files in /usr/include/linux ? Is a crude copy or is it
done via a make target ?
According FHS (and Debian, RH,... follow FHS), /usr/include/linux
is created
Daniel Phillips wrote:
. A Microsoft engineer wrote scripts/Configure. For three years, I have
lived in fear that Microsoft would notice this fact and use it to attack
Linux through public relations channels or legal means. They haven't yet,
so I have been wrong so far.
Teehee. I
Daniel Phillips wrote:
I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be make autoconfig?
Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above.
Yes. It should be make autoconfig, for symmterty reasons :-)
I called the files and the project autoconfigure, because
'autoconfig' is
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think right now, the only halfway reasonable thing is to do what
ttyname() does: get the devide number off stat(/), and search it in /dev.
(Besides, you can figure out part of the answer - about as much as the
autoprober does
Greg KH wrote:
What about devices that are supported by more than one driver? How do
you handle that? (see the USB keyspan_pda and keyspan drivers for an
example.)
I check the devices supported by multiple drivers, and normally
I comment both probes (This is why I have so much probes
Leif Sawyer wrote:
Picked USB HCI's as modular (building all) from VIA motherboard.
(Don't really need the OHCI built here)
This is a know problem. The problem is: we don't know yet
if a given USB configuration is a USB card, a USB kernel support
(i.e. USBFS, OHCI, EHCI...).
The
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
With attacched config.out, the MODULES
is a tristate. I think this is wrong, because
modules support can be only build-in.
MODULES is special, see the dicumentation on trit_tie.
In my config.out I can have
Keith Owens wrote:
=
Why are those deduction messages appearing in menuconfig? I just did
make oldconfig, the config should be stable. I did not change anything
in menuconfig, just saved it.
=
OUCH! The output from make menuconfig has significantly more options
than make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, here's all I want to know about the whole CML2/kbuild 2.5 issue. Right
now I upgrade my kernel like this (simplified slightly):
apply latest patches
mv .config ..
make mrproper
mv ../.config .
make oldconfig
make dep
make bzlilo modules
Hello Eric,
Now I remember that you propose to me to detect the version of
tools and program, to give user some warning about dangerous
configurations in CML2.
In people.debian.org/~cate/files/kautoconfigure/autoconfigure/new/
you will find the latest version.
It detects and feed version and
Keith Owens wrote:
I have no idea what you mean by that. Which filenames are missing the
leading 's' and which file is missing it?
in drivers/pcmcia/Makefile.in:
objlink(sa1100_cs.o sa1100_generic.o)
objlink(CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET
Keith Owens wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:39:16 +0200,
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith Owens wrote:
Maybe a better solution: mrproper don't depend on .config.
I convert user_command() to 'make' rules in place, so the result
replaces user_command(). The expanded
Keith Owens wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 17:05:57 +0200,
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUG:
$ make mrproper
$ make mrproper
Error: you must create a .config first
mrproper should not depend on .config (contents and
existance).
kbuild 2.4 relies on everybody coding the
Hello.
I tried kbuild 1.3, it compile without problems.
But I noticed that some asm warning come with
/tmp/. So I think that -pipe option is not right
propagated. (on i386).
BTW how to debug kbuild?
When I recompile kernel I see phase 5 before phase 4.
Should you rename the phases?
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi cate@dplanet.
Now if I 'make oldconfig' with my old CML1 .config and CML2 oldconfig, I
should
confirm all 'No' options. (and menuconfig show NEW to all 'N' options).
I want that your CML2 (probably in makefile) implements something as
actual
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My proposal is instaed of complain about configuration violatation,
you just wrote the possible correct configuration and prompt user to
select the correct configuration.
In the case you cite, e.g. oldconfig shoud prompt:
16 matches
Mail list logo
