On Wednesday 16 January 2002 11:38 am, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> At this point the rules are compiled and a dialog box indicates that
> Suppression has been turned off (press any key to continue). I hit any key
> and am presented with the first menu.
Ah, I understand the bug.
That dialog indic
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 03:41 pm, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Release 2.1.3: Tue Jan 15 14:41:45 EST 2002
> > > > * The `vitality' flag is gone from the language. Instead, the
> > > > autopr
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 03:24 pm, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> To invoke the autoconfigurator, you do one of two things:
>
> `make autoconfigure'
> This runs the autoconfigurator in standalone mode. This gives you
> an entire configuration, ready to build with.
>
> `make autoprobe {config,men
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 03:25 pm, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:53:24PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > * The `vitality' flag is gone from the language. Instead, the
> > autoprober detects the type of your root filesystem and forces
> > its symbol to Y.
>
>
On Saturday 29 December 2001 05:43 pm, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE
> >
> > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide?
>
> The CML1 rules seem to imply that this set is empty.
There are, apparently, paralell port
On Thursday 06 December 2001 07:57 pm, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > P.S. Can we seperate "add new subsystem y prime" and "remove old
> > subsystem y". LIke the new and old SCSI error handling, which have been
> >
On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:25 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So has anyone had time to test the Python version 1.5 based CML2 that
> > was posted? Would that make it more acceptable?
>
> For 2.5 its a great leap forward. For 2.4 its irrelevant. Its simply not
> the way stable kernel trees are run,
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:49 am, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > It's insidious, isn't it?
>
> Yes, I agree the method you're using to smuggle CML2 into
> a stable kernel is insidious. Please stop it.
1) I'm not. You're getting your players confused.
2) I don't think Marcelo would take it, so I
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:43 pm, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > After CML2 has proven itself in 2.5, I do plan to go back to Marcelo
> > and lobby for him accepting it into 2.4, on the grounds that doing so
> > will simplify his maintainance task no end.
>
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 03:20 pm, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> FYI, I have never known a problem that python has solved, only
> changed.
The same could be said of C. By definition, any program that can be
expressed in C could have been done on paper in binary.
Rob
10 matches
Mail list logo
