On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
sections in header files. We know how obfuscated C can be, and this also
applies to
On 7/21/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:39:16PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:21:43PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
while you could try and make a claim against memory/cpu effeciency, i
fail to see how the first or last claims
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:13:26AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
sections in header files. We