[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I've done that in my rulesfile, thanks. Here is the current list of
> ignored symbols:
> derive CMDLINE_BOOL from n
etc...
That'll nicely break oldconfig behaviour when the options in question do
get merged into the main tree, won't it?
Can you make them opti
Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > CONFIG_XSCALE_IQ80310
>
> 1- This symbol is mine;
> 2- It is part of 2.4.6-pre5 only as a dependency argument, with no
>point where a value is actually assigned to it;
> 3- It is likely to be different when the actual question for which the
>user nee
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> The following configuration symbols in 2.4.6pre5 do not have
> Congfgure.help entries,:
[...]
> CONFIG_XSCALE_IQ80310
1- This symbol is mine;
2- It is part of 2.4.6-pre5 only as a dependency argument, with no
point where a value is actually assi
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:49:34PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > CONFIG_XSCALE_IQ80310
>
> I think we've covered this one before.
Yes. But if I don't ask, I won't ncessarily know when it changes status.
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Er
