Re: [kbuild-devel] thoughts on an official Kconfig "maturity" option

2007-04-12 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > rather than post to the LKML, is this the right forum to ask about > > implementing an actual "maturity" directive in the build > > infrastructure? thanks. > > Hi rday. > No this

Re: [kbuild-devel] thoughts on an official Kconfig "maturity" option

2007-04-12 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > rather than post to the LKML, is this the right forum to ask about > implementing an actual "maturity" directive in the build > infrastructure? thanks. Hi rday. No this is not the right forum for this question - lkml is a mu

[kbuild-devel] thoughts on an official Kconfig "maturity" option

2007-04-12 Thread Robert P. J. Day
rather than post to the LKML, is this the right forum to ask about implementing an actual "maturity" directive in the build infrastructure? thanks. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel