On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:10:49PM -0400, Robert M. Love wrote:
> On 21 May 2001 02:29:17 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > John> Au contraire. It is very reasonable to have both python and
> > John> python2 installed. Having two different gcc versions installed
> > John> is a big pain in the arse.
On 20 May 2001, Robert M. Love wrote:
>I think this is a very important point, and one I agree with. I tend to
>let my distribution handle stuff like python. now, I use RedHat's
>on-going devel, RawHide. it is not using python2. in fact, since
>switching to python2 may break old stuff, I don't
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:10:49PM -0400, Robert M. Love wrote:
> >
> > im not installing python2 from source just so i can run some new config
> > utility.
>
> python2 will be in rawhide when 2.5 development requires it, if I'm not much
> mistaken.
On 21 May 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> John> Au contraire. It is very reasonable to have both python and
> John> python2 installed. Having two different gcc versions installed
> John> is a big pain in the arse.
>
> It's not unreasonable to have both installed, it's unreasonable to
> require it
On 21 May 2001 02:29:17 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> John> Au contraire. It is very reasonable to have both python and
> John> python2 installed. Having two different gcc versions installed
> John> is a big pain in the arse.
>
> It's not unreasonable to have both installed, it's unreasonable to
> "John" == John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Telling them to install an updated gcc for kernel compilation is a
>> necessary evil, which can easily be done without disturbing the
>> rest of the system. Updating the system's python installation is
>> not a re
Somebody failed to track a module name change.
--- drivers/sbus/char/Makefile 2001/05/20 15:33:48 1.1
+++ drivers/sbus/char/Makefile 2001/05/20 15:34:03
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_SUN_AURORA) += aurora.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TADPOLE_TS102_UCTRL) += uctrl.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SUN
