Re: [kbuild-devel] Draft transition plan

2001-06-27 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Hello! Could you upload the patches to sourceforge (base 2.4.6-pre5) ? In this manner we can see the status of kbuild and make some test before it would be publicly released. I'm curios to see the Keith's works (and also to test it). (CML2 is widely tested, but the kbuild are tested only by few

[kbuild-devel] scripts/kernel-doc improvements

2001-06-27 Thread Christian Kreibich
Hi, I've found this list through the MAINTAINERS file. Apologies if I'm posting to the wrong place. I've been playing with the documentation-generating scripts lately, and I was wondering if there's a reason why kernel-doc is so restrictive? In particular, it doesn't allow any whitespace after

Re: [kbuild-devel] scripts/kernel-doc improvements

2001-06-27 Thread Christian Kreibich
Doh, line wrap. Sorry. --- kernel-doc.orig Wed Jun 27 22:30:17 2001 +++ kernel-doc Wed Jun 27 22:54:54 2001 @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ # Functions prototyped as foo(void) same as foo() # Stop eval'ing where we don't need to. # -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] + +# 27/06/2001 - All

Re: [kbuild-devel] scripts/kernel-doc improvements

2001-06-27 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:11:45AM +0200, Christian Kreibich wrote: > > Doh, line wrap. Sorry. you probably want to send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] personally I would much rather use a Real Source Doc System than this god-ugly script, but john -- "Now that your reco

Re: [kbuild-devel] Draft transition plan

2001-06-27 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:07:37 +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Could you upload the patches to sourceforge (base 2.4.6-pre5) ? > >In this manner we can see the status of kbuild and make some >test before it would be publicly released. >I'm curios to see the Keith's works (and a