[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.12 is available

2001-12-30 Thread Keith Owens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:31:42 +1100, Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This announcement is for the base kbuild 2.5 code, i386 against 2.4.16. >Patches for other architectures and kernels will be out l

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 12:44:06AM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > But yes, it seems possible to replace the -MD dependency file, which > depends on a specific config, with a generic dependency file, which knows > about our #ifdef CONFIG_XXX and translates them to the corresponding > ifeq(CONFIG

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Rob Landley
On Saturday 29 December 2001 05:43 pm, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE > > > > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide? > > The CML1 rules seem to imply that this set is empty. There are, apparently, paralell port

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Alan Cox
> > > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide? > > The CML1 rules seem to imply that this set is empty. > > There are, apparently, paralell port IDE devices. > > I've never seen one, but we've got drivers for them. See PARIDE and > paride_devices. There are IDE drives on just about

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:39:02PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > It may be that the reason our experiences have been different is because we > focus on different target languages. But I think my experience is an > existence proof that there *is* demand for localization and that meeting > it ca

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide? Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour can come later - that shouldn't be done at the same time as introducing CML2. -- dwmw2 _

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE > > > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide? > > Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour > can come later

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE > > > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide? > > Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour > can come later - t

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Localization for technical messages sucks. badly. > Just take a look at a european computer magazine, you will find lots of > english words in the text because there is no german/frensh/whatever > one. Trying to use different grammar doesn't help the understanding. Or

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:39:02PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > It may be that the reason our experiences have been different is because we > > focus on different target languages. But I think my experience is an > > existence proof that there

[kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

2001-12-30 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:20:01 + (GMT), Alan Cox wrote: > > Frankly, I find it very amusing that advocates of i18n efforts tend to > > be either British or USAnians. Folks, get real - your languages are > > too close to show where the problems are. I can see how doing that > > gives you a warm

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.12 is available

2001-12-30 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:54:48 -0500, Albert Cranford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is it just me or did 1.12 break i386 in 2.4.18-pre1? >I applied linux-2.4.18-pre1 then: >kbuild-2.5-2.4.16-3 >kbuild-2.5-2.4.17-1 >kbuild-2.5-2.4.18-pre1-1 >cp /tmp/saved.config /usr/src/linux/.config

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.12 is available

2001-12-30 Thread Albert Cranford
Keith Owens wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:31:42 +1100, > Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >This announcement is for the base kbuild 2.5 code, i386 against 2.4.16. > > http://sourcefo