[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:18:12 +0200, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"touch include/linux/mm.h" doesn't cause a recompile of any object. I have found a bug that is probably causing your problem. Can you confirm that you are using a common source and object directory, i.e. no separate ob

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-08 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Keith Owens wrote: > >"touch include/linux/mm.h" doesn't cause a recompile of any object. > > I have found a bug that is probably causing your problem. Can you > confirm that you are using a common source and object directory, i.e. > no separate object tree? Yes, so fa

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-08 Thread Keith Owens
New core code for kbuild 2.5 is available in http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/kbuild/kbuild-2.5-core-2.bz2 Backout core-1 then apply this patch. Changes from core-1. Do not set KBUILD_OBJECT for objects that are linked into multiple conglomerates, there is no unambiguous KBUILD_OBJECT valu

[kbuild-devel] kbuild PowerPC port

2002-04-08 Thread Brendan J Simon
Anyone working on the PowerPC ports for Kbuild-2.5 release 2 ?? Regards, Brendan Simon. ___ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel

[kbuild-devel] KBUILD: upgrading to release 2 from previous release

2002-04-08 Thread Brendan J Simon
Is it easy to patch from release 2 from the the previous release of kbuild-2.5 ? ie. is it as easy as untarring everyting in the Linux source directory that has the previous kbuild-2.5 patches applied ?? Maybe I have to remvoe the Makefile-2.5 directory and the entire scripts directory first ?

Re: [kbuild-devel] KBUILD: upgrading to release 2 from previous release

2002-04-08 Thread Brendan J Simon
I'm using a configuration management system. The kernel is in the repository. It has some custom mods and the kbuild-2.5 (previous release) applied. I just wanted to apply the new one over the top. I could probably backout the the changeset that put the kbuild patches in but I've never do

[kbuild-devel] upgrading to kbuild-2.5 release 2

2002-04-08 Thread Brendan J Simon
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 19:45, Brendan J Simon wrote: >> Is it easy to patch from release 2 from the the previous release of >> kbuild-2.5 ? >> ie. is it as easy as untarring everyting in the Linux source directory >> that has the previous kbuild-2.5 patches applied ?? >> Maybe I have to remvoe t

Re: [kbuild-devel] KBUILD: upgrading to release 2 from previous release

2002-04-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002 12:45:18 +1000, Brendan J Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is it easy to patch from release 2 from the the previous release of >kbuild-2.5 ? >ie. is it as easy as untarring everyting in the Linux source directory >that has the previous kbuild-2.5 patches applied ?? >Maybe I

Re: [kbuild-devel] kbuild PowerPC port

2002-04-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002 12:43:07 +1000, Brendan J Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Anyone working on the PowerPC ports for Kbuild-2.5 release 2 ?? I will be asking the arch maintainers to do kbuild 2.5 patches for their architecture, after I have done ia64 to make sure there are no arch dependent f

[kbuild-devel] Re: kbuild 2.0 (core 1 and 2) b0rken on sparc64

2002-04-08 Thread Keith Owens
On 08 Apr 2002 19:38:23 -0700, Thomas Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have not investigated deeply as to why this is happening, but thought >I would fire off an email to see if you might know what would be causing >it, but it seems that the new kbuild v2.0 does not work on sparc64. I >have t