Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 1.2

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 09:19:27PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > At http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc/ you can find the latest version of > the new config system. I've got a question / feature request. Right now, CML1 doesn't like something like the following: # Any / all of the following bools ca

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 1.2

2002-10-29 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Tom Rini wrote: > How would I do this with the new syntax, other than: > config FTR_A >bool >depends on BOARD_A || BOARD_B >default y > ... > > The desire is to be able to add in support for a new platform, without > having to rely on much context to patch (or, have a file be > a

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 1.2

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:58:41AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > How would I do this with the new syntax, other than: > > config FTR_A > >bool > >depends on BOARD_A || BOARD_B > >default y > > ... > > > > The desire is to be able to add in support for a n

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 1.2

2002-10-29 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > Now, can that be done any smaller? (one line, after it's defined once) Even smaller? What do you mean? bye, Roman --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thin

Re: [kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 1.2

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:47:56AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Now, can that be done any smaller? (one line, after it's defined once) > > Even smaller? What do you mean? Well, less lines. Is: config FTR_A bool default y if BOARD_A legal ? --

[kbuild-devel] linux kernel conf 1.3

2002-10-29 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, At http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc/ you can find as usual the latest version of the new config system. Changes: - Update to 2.5.45 - Detect a few more qt settings (e.g. multithreaded library, qt path) and remember it. bye, Roman --- This s