Hi,
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a proper way to place that "calculated" value representing
"yes, something non-null was selected" inside the choice construct
without getting a kbuild warning? really, that's where it belongs.
Why do you want to put it within the choice? I see nothing wrong
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a proper way to place that "calculated" value representing
"yes, something non-null was selected" inside the choice construct without
getting a kbuild warning? really, that's where it belongs.
Why do you want to put it
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> technically, i see nothing wrong with putting it after the choice.
> aesthetically and philosophically, i'd like to see that sort of thing allowed
> within the choice since it's so tightly related and, in effect, only *has*
> meaning in relation
