[kbuild-devel] changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hi! Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require a full kernel rebuild? If so, I'd like to fix it, since I like copying my kernel source with --preserve and changing the local version, then going back to the old version in case of a crash. Its important to change the local vers

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:22:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi! > Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require > a full kernel rebuild? > > If so, I'd like to fix it, since I like copying > my kernel source with --preserve and changing the > local version, then going

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > > Do you use "echo -mylocalver > localversion" to change the local version? > > > > Sam > > No, I do makemenuconfig to edit the version. Is that right? That is fine too. When building - do you use separate output dir? Sam -

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:22:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hi! > > Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require > > a full kernel rebuild? > > > > If so, I'd l

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:22:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hi! > > Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require > > a full kernel rebuild? > > > > If so, I'd l

[kbuild-devel] Re: [PATCH] split UTS_RELEASE to a separate header.

2005-01-16 Thread Brian Gerst
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:22:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Hi! Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require a full kernel rebuild? If so, I'

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": > > > > > Do you use "echo -mylocalver > localversion" to change the local version? > > > > > > Sam > > > > No, I do makemenuconfig to edit the version. Is that right? > > That is fine too

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:22:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hi! > > Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require > > a full kernel rebuild? > > > > If so, I'd l

[kbuild-devel] Re: changing local version requires full rebuild

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": > > > > > Do you use "echo -mylocalver > localversion" to change the local version? > > > > > > Sam > > > > No, I do makemenuconfig to edit the version. Is that right? > > That is fine too

[kbuild-devel] [PATCH] split UTS_RELEASE to a separate header.

2005-01-16 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello! Quoting r. Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: changing local version requires full rebuild": > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:22:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hi! > > Is it just me, or does changing the local version always require > > a full kernel rebuild? > > > > If so, I'd l