Kai Germaschewski wrote:
You must be missing some of the changes (My first push to bkbits was
incomplete, since I did inadvertently edit Makefile without checking it
out, I do that mistake all the time...). It's fixed in the current repo.
Can't bitkeeper be setup to have readonly files for
Le jeu 03/10/2002 à 04:59, Kai Germaschewski a écrit :
Hi,
I'd appreciate to get comments on the appended patch. It's mostly cleanups
and the like, but the interesting part is the last cset, which is actually
fairly small:
14 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
The
Le jeu 03/10/2002 à 16:56, Kai Germaschewski a écrit :
This would avoid recursive make, which isn't really a good idea (even if
it's used widely). Here is a good agument about that:
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~soumen/teach/cs699a1999/make.html
I think I heard that before, but I would
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER) := $(patsubst %.c,%.o,$(wildcard *.c))
+obj-y := dsfield.o dsmthdat.o dsopcode.o dswexec.o dswscope.o \
+dsmethod.o dsobject.o dsutils.o dswload.o dswstate.o
Should that have been:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:01:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Now it's testing time..
[...]
You must be missing some of the changes (My first push to bkbits was
incomplete, since I did inadvertently edit Makefile without checking it
out, I do that
On 3 Oct 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Could you do instead:
include subdir/Makefile
?
It's not quite that easy, unfortunately ;(
This would avoid recursive make, which isn't really a good idea (even if
it's used widely). Here is a good agument about that:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:38:22PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
You must be missing some of the changes (My first push to bkbits was
incomplete, since I did inadvertently edit Makefile without checking it
out, I do that mistake all the time...). It's fixed in the current repo.
Did a pull
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:59:00PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
Hi,
I'd appreciate to get comments on the appended patch. It's mostly cleanups
and the like, but the interesting part is the last cset, which is actually
fairly small:
Tried out what I pulled from linux-2.5.make
1)
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:26:18PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Hmmm, was the stuff present at bkbits incomplete?
Just checked, yes the attached patch was never. And fixes I think all the
above.
A new round of testing needed
Sam
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:59:00PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
Hi,
I'd appreciate to get comments on the appended patch.
-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER) := $(patsubst %.c,%.o,$(wildcard *.c))
+obj-y := dsfield.o dsmthdat.o dsopcode.o dswexec.o dswscope.o \
+ dsmethod.o
[Sam Ravnborg]
+ifdef list-multi
+$(warning kbuild: list-multi ($(list-multi)) is obsolete in 2.5. Please fix!)
+endif
Since kbuild no longer support list-multi this should be $(error )
Except that it is harmless. list-multi is a hint which the kbuild
system no longer needs. Code
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:01:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Now it's testing time..
1)
In order to make it link I had to change the following in rules.make:
# If the list of objects to link is empty, just create an empty O_TARGET
cmd_link_o_target = $(if $(strip $(obj-y)),\
-
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:38:22PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:01:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Now it's testing time..
[...]
You must be missing some of the changes (My first push to bkbits was
incomplete,
On Oct 02, 2002 21:59 -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
The build process remains recursive, but it changes the recursion
from
make -C subdir
to
make -f subdir/Makefile
i.e. the current working directory remains the top dir for all times. So
gcc/ld/.. are now called from the
14 matches
Mail list logo
