On 3/6/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
sr Suggestion:
sr We are now warned about an incompatibility in kbuild and we will
sr fix this asap. But that you postpone this particular behaviour
sr change until next make release. Maybe you add in
%% Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sr I foresee a lot of mails to lkml the next year or more with this
sr issue if kept. People do build older kernels and continue to do so
sr the next long time. Especially the embedded market seem keen to
sr stay at 2.4 (wonder why), and as such
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
sr Suggestion:
sr We are now warned about an incompatibility in kbuild and we will
sr fix this asap. But that you postpone this particular behaviour
sr change until next make release. Maybe you add in this change as
sr the first thing after the stable relase so all
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 3/6/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
sr Suggestion:
sr We are now warned about an incompatibility in kbuild and we will
sr fix this asap. But that you postpone this particular behaviour
sr change until next make release. Maybe
[linux-kernel added. Please keep both bug-make and linux-kernel]
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:46:25AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
Hi all. I've set Reply-To: to the bug-make@gnu.org list; I'm hoping we
can keep the discussion there since I don't
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:21:08PM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sr I foresee a lot of mails to lkml the next year or more with this
sr issue if kept. People do build older kernels and continue to do so
sr the next long time. Especially the
