[kbuild-devel] [BUG] .append file handling

2002-04-07 Thread Richard Chan
Folks, I think I've encountered a bug in Makefile.in.append file handling. I am using shadow trees with kbuild-2.5 v2.0 i386 2.4.18. Seems that pp_makefile1 tries to create the merged Makefile.in but the directory doesn't exist. E.g Shadow tree has fs/Makefile.in.append pp_makefile1 tries t

[kbuild-devel] Re: [BUG] .append file handling

2002-04-07 Thread Keith Owens
On 07 Apr 2002 21:31:06 +0800, Richard Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Seems that pp_makefile1 tries to create the merged Makefile.in but the >directory doesn't exist. Yes, pp_makefile1 needs to do mkdir before copying files to the object directory. I will fix that in kbuild-2.5-core-2, out to

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-07 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Keith Owens wrote: > kbuild 2.5: > make -j8 oldconfig installable 8:51 (no make dep needed :) > make -j8 oldconfig installable :14 (second run, no changes) These 14 seconds (or 37 seconds on my machine) are always needed whatever I try, e.g. "make foo/bar.o" also needs that time. Some

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-07 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:18:12 +0200, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens wrote: > >> kbuild 2.5: >> make -j8 oldconfig installable 8:51 (no make dep needed :) >> make -j8 oldconfig installable :14 (second run, no changes) > >These 14 seconds (or 37 seconds on my machine) are

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-07 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Keith Owens wrote: > >These 14 seconds (or 37 seconds on my machine) are always needed > >whatever I try, e.g. "make foo/bar.o" also needs that time. > > make NO_MAKEFILE_GEN=1 foo/bar.o. Very low overhead for quick and > dirty testing of changes, but if you want an accurate kernel build,

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-07 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:51:36 +0200, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens wrote: >> make NO_MAKEFILE_GEN=1 foo/bar.o. Very low overhead for quick and >> dirty testing of changes, but if you want an accurate kernel build, you >> have to take the overhead. kbuild 2.4 overhead for a

[kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-07 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Keith Owens wrote: > It takes time to do all the analysis to work out what has changed and > what has been affected. You might know that you only changed one file > but kernel build and make don't know that until they have checked > everything. Changing one file or specifying a command ove

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

2002-04-07 Thread Brendan J Simon
Keith Owens wrote: >It takes time to do all the analysis to work out what has changed and >what has been affected. You might know that you only changed one file >but kernel build and make don't know that until they have checked >everything. Changing one file or specifying a command override m