Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 01:14:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Would it be OK if we have arch/x86_64/boot present and have stub Makefiles
in all directories?
If thats OK I can try to cook up something.
That's certainly acceptable as an interrim solution. The right thing
can wait for the x86 merge, probably.
The general issue with current infrastructure is that we do not
honour $(src) and $(obj) in the implicit rules.
So I added these.
Then next problem is how to set src to the correct value.
For arch/x86_64/boot I could just set it in the make invocation.
For directories below boot/ I do not know yet how to do it.
With patch below and with a one line Makefile in
x86_64/boot thet just included arch/i386/boot/Makefile
I could compile the boot directory.
So not a full solution yet but on the right track.
FWIW, in the meantime I'm making forward progress simply by symlinking
arch/x86_64/boot - ../../i386/boot. Works great, but I don't think
symlinks in the tarball are accepted, and if it's dynamically generated
it would break O=.
-hpa
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
kbuild-devel mailing list
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel