t to reply emails using it :)
Hi Matti,
We have updated your personal address in the build system.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
These are automated emails from the Intel zero day built bot. I just
look over the Smatch warnings and hit send. :/ I'm not sure how it
picks the recipient list.
Hi Dan,
We have updated the smatch, the head commit is 10ef4ac4 ("mtag: delete
unused get_mtag() function")
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 3/21/19 2:18 PM, Li, Philip wrote:
Thanks Dan, we will update our smatch code to latest and adopt in build cluster
as
soon as possible.
---
Hi Dan,
I can reproduce the problem built with allyesconfig on i386.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 4/4/19 11:58 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
To be honest, I don't know why these false positives are still showing
up... :(
regards,
dan carpenter
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:37:41PM +0800, kbuild
ee, then I can find the commit, the commit's author,
then notify them.
Sorry for the mistake, the tree is a internal tree, please kindly ignore it.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
___
kbuild mailing list
kbuild@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild
Hi Nick,
Please ignore this mail, it's a internal tree from our kernel team,
sorry for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 6/21/19 9:42 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
tree: yhuang/autonuma8
head: 680d1ffe9e1c834b7290982ed61f7c409680a9bf
c
LKML for internal
trees?
Hi Nick,
The internal tree that you see is allowed to expose out, you could
forward mail to the below addresses if necessary.
CC: kbuild-...@01.org
TO: Huang Ying
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
head: 66ba79a988fd1e7a3385c7edfed0a29f6e53ca76
c
Hi Nick,
0day monitors new trees from git log/github/git.kernel.org and tests
changed branches by default,
we also have a blacklist to ignore branches on request.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 7/9/19 2:05 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
+ Rong, Philip
How does 0day know to watch this tree+branch
On 7/10/19 2:29 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:36 PM Rong Chen wrote:
0day monitors new trees from git log/github/git.kernel.org and tests
changed branches by default,
we also have a blacklist to ignore branches on request.
Cool, thanks for the explanation. Sometimes
On 7/12/19 2:22 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
+ Rong, Philip
Does this machine have aarch64-linux-gnu-ld install? I cannot reproduce.
Hi Nick,
Sorry for the inconvenience, it's our fault, we'll fix it asap.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 8:11 PM kbuild test ro
using the misunderstanding, kbuild bot sets bisect range to
0.. in some special cases.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
___
kbuild mailing list
kbuild@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild
push them for easier
collaboration, and 0-day can end up making a bit of noise for things
that are not quite upstream ready.
+ Rong
Hi Keith,
We can blacklist branches with patterns, could you tell us what kind of
branch name we need to skip?
Best Regards,
Rong
Nick,
The attachment should be in the original mail named as '.config.gz', but
we didn't preserve it. Could you forward it?
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
compiler: clang version 10.0.0 (git://gitmirror/llvm_project
45a3fd206fb06f77a08968c99a8172cbf2ccdd0f)
reprodu
ions: https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki/Repo-Spec
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
--
Regards,
Atish
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:17 PM kbuild test robot
wrote:
CC: kbuild-...@lists.01.org
TO: Atish Patra
tree: https://github.com/atishp04/linux efi_stub
head: 7dbf2060ab3115d2edcfba8f0f677a321a
On 11/26/19 2:11 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:11 AM Rong Chen wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 11/22/19 3:10 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:46 PM Atish Patra wrote:
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 22:39 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
Atish, below is a report
3440
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
Hi Kefeng,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20191128]
[cannot apply to v5.4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '-
___
kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org
___
kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.org
___
kbuild mailing list -- kbuild@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-le...@lists.01.or
Hi Denis,
Thanks for your reminding, we have ignored this warning.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 12/29/20 2:41 PM, Denis Efremov wrote:
Hi,
Could you please disable automatic emails based on this rule?
The rule requires an update after sysfs_emit patchset by Joe Perches
was merged.
https
returns false if state->fb is NULL, so
this is good.
Thanks. These warnings are from the zero day bot. On my own system
with the cross function DB then Smatch parses this correctly and does
not print a warning. I probably should have looked at this harder
before forwa
reported
On 6/25/20 5:50 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
CC: kbuild-...@lists.01.org
In-Reply-To: <20200624171749.11927-6-...@herbertland.com>
References: <20200624171749.11927-6-...@herbertland.com>
TO: Tom Herbert
Hi Tom,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test W
20 matches
Mail list logo
