Re: [kde] Yet another failed KDE release?

2013-04-02 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2013-03-25, dE . wrote: As stated before, the best way to find bugs is constant usability testing. Beta 1 and beta 2 have a few days in between releases, so what do you expect these testers to upgraded every day and yet use their system normally? Instead they attempt to just see if

Re: [kde] Yet another failed KDE release?

2013-04-02 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2013-03-28, Kevin Chadwick wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:21:47 +0100 Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote: I certainly think freedesktop.org should change it's name perhaps to enterprisedesktop.org or maybe cloudesktop.org I didn't get the context of that one. Various

Re: [kde] Yet another failed KDE release?

2013-04-02 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday, 2013-03-29, dE . wrote: See, we all agree with the fact that KDE SC is a complicated project and it's a good design; for starters Akonadi is the only piece of software proving the likes of MS exchange. But the project doesn't have enough developers to satisfy the release needs,

[kde] How to learn about all those configuration file values?

2013-04-02 Thread adrelanos
Hi! There is an Ubuntu Package kde-settings-lowfat. The creator of that package must have somehow learned how to configure and/or deactivate certain things to his liking in a clean way, i.e. not just copy your whole ~/.kde folder. I plan on activating most changes from kde-settings-lowfat for my