On sobota, 23 marca 2013 09:55:42 CEST, dE . wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Myriam Schweingruber <myr...@kde.org>wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, dE . <de.tec...@gmail.com> wrote: ...
I'm asking the devs to work less and in a relaxed manner, and they've
problems with that. Everyone benefits that way. Bugs get fixed, devs are
less pressured on.
I'ld have absolutely not complained if this was not the 'stable' release,
but this's what KDE team calls stable and that's unacceptable.
There ain't many bug related complaints about Xfce -- it's a lot more
stable. I personally hardly found any bugs while using it.
Comparing apples with oranges, Xfce has only a fraction of the
software that is shipped with a KDE SC release.
...
Another reason why KDE should have longer release cycle, and another reason
for the no. of bugs. Xfce being smaller, has longer releases, they wait for
years between major release, just testing it; KDE on the other hand, being
many times heavy has shorter release cycles.
...
... ...
You know, that's practically not possible. No one's gonna do it. Instead
the DE components should checked for this since the bulk of KDE users
upgrade.
... ...
I do that always, unless I misinterpreted the cause of the bug.
...
I'm running on Gentoo, and I've to build the 9999 release for the purpose,
which almost never works, and then reverting back becomes very difficult.
However I'm using the 'unstable' versions of KDE (relative to Gentoo,
according to which 4.9.5 is sable). This's solely for the purpose of
reporting bugs; but they almost never get fixed by the final stable release.
The best way to test is constant usability testing cause bugs never come up
when you're searching for them; they come up when you seriously use it for
your real tasks.
Regards, Myriam
PS. And BTW, you might have seen that we all sing with our names, how
about signing your mails? Or is this on purpose to do anonymous
ramblings? I am not going to call you what Slashdot would, though.
I prefer to remain anon. And I go by this name only.
Actually I think that you may be right, although I use 4.10.1 and I think it is
a great and no new bugs encountred so far (pager works fine). At the moment KDE
4.9.5 is really feature complete and fully usable, there is no need since 4.6.5
to rush quickly with development cycle. 2 years is very long time but if 6
months is not enough then It should be elongated.
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
