Re: [kde] Nepomuk

2012-10-17 Thread Brian J Densmore
On Wed, October 17, 2012 1:44 am, Stephen Dowdy wrote: > Felix Miata wrote, On 10/12/2012 09:50 PM: >> On 2012-10-12 16:28 (GMT-0500) Brian J Densmore composed: >> >>> Nepomuk is required to be installed in the latest KDE. >> >> But it isn't required to be running. KDE is highly configurable. Look

Re: [kde] Nepomuk

2012-10-16 Thread Stephen Dowdy
Felix Miata wrote, On 10/12/2012 09:50 PM: > On 2012-10-12 16:28 (GMT-0500) Brian J Densmore composed: > >> Nepomuk is required to be installed in the latest KDE. > > But it isn't required to be running. KDE is highly configurable. Look up the > following: > nepomukserverrc > nepomukstrigirc > [

Re: [kde] Nepomuk

2012-10-12 Thread Felix Miata
On 2012-10-12 16:28 (GMT-0500) Brian J Densmore composed: Nepomuk is required to be installed in the latest KDE. But it isn't required to be running. KDE is highly configurable. Look up the following: nepomukserverrc nepomukstrigirc [Basic Settings] Start Nepomuk=false [main Settings] Used S

Re: [kde] Nepomuk

2012-10-12 Thread Duncan
Brian J Densmore posted on Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:28:42 -0500 as excerpted: > This is really getting very annoying. > > Nepomuk is required to be installed in the latest KDE. > > I don't want Nepomuk installed. I can understand it's not an option to > not have it in KDE, because many apps make use

[kde] Nepomuk

2012-10-12 Thread Brian J Densmore
This is really getting very annoying. Nepomuk is required to be installed in the latest KDE. I don't want Nepomuk installed. I can understand it's not an option to not have it in KDE, because many apps make use of it. However, I don't want it running and scanning/indexing my drive, and I definite